Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Interesting. Tiny question though. I don’t think they needed democrats to observe how they cheated for the democrats.
i didn't see any mention of democrat observers so i don't know if they were/weren't there but, as you point out, it doesn't really matter since the assumption is that they wouldn't report a miscount in favor of the democrats. we do know ( from the article ) that an independent observer remained and that the GOP observers weren't told to go home.
Everyday you say there is some new bombshell evidence but trumps attorney are like 1-46
With 5 dismissals on Friday alone.
And the elections from all the battleground states have been certified despite the daily bombshell evidence.
Is it more likely that Trump lost the general election y 7 million votes and secured 306 electoral votes
Or
There is a international conspiracy involving dominion flipping ballots, stolen ballots, dead people voting, fake ballots trucked in,Iran ,Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, soros ,the clintons ,the cia ,fbi ,DOJ ,Germany ,Republican and democratic judges on the county state and federal level all involved in a plot to steal the election from Donald trump.
The second optIon is just crazy town.
And this is why nobody responds to you. You’re non-sensical.
95% of Americans ± 1.5% have no understanding of polls.
Suppose you have Candidate A polling at 49% and Candidate B polling at 45% with a ±5% margin of error.
Who is the winner?
You cannot know that.
The confidence interval for Candidate A is 44% to 54%.
The confidence interval for Candidate B is 40% to 50%.
As everyone can plainly see, the confidence intervals overlap with Candidate B at 50% on the high end and Candidate A at 44% on the low end.
Therefore, you cannot predict a winner.
Now, suppose you have Candidate A polling at 49% and Candidate B polling at 45% with a ±1.5% margin of error.
The confidence interval for Candidate A is 47.5% to 50.5%.
The confidence interval for Candidate B is 43.5% to 46.5%.
As everyone can plainly see, there is a 1% gap in the confidence interval, therefore you would predict that Candidate A should win.
That works for all polls. Suppose a click-bait headline on a website said the majority of Americans do not have $400 for an emergency based on a poll that says 52% of Americans cannot with a margin of error of ±3.5%.
The confidence interval is 48.5% to 55.5%.
Since 48.5% < 50.1%, the click-bait headline is just plain wrong.
Now, if the margin of error was ±1.5%, then the confidence interval is 50.5% to 53.5% and the click-bait headline actually told the truth (for once).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
