Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What is your area of expertise to make such a claim? There are many safeguards in our election system, and as someone who spent a good portion of their life in data security, I understand this. ALL of the election officials from around the country including the guy who oversaw the election at the national level agree that the election was secure. You might want to reconsider where you get your information because you're simply wrong. It is not easy to cheat and to get away with it.
Then they are ignorant...a voting application checks many databases in real time to make sure that the voter is legal...if that were done, it would prevent a whole host of problems...that along with real ID and audits would clean up the election. It’s not rocket science.
Texas lawsuit - expert witness gave Biden a 1 in a quadrillion chance of winning those swing states based on real statistical analysis. Sounds like a winner to me, and SCOTUS asking for the Defendant's response by Thursday is a sign they see this case having merit.
This is a great video analysis on YouTube of the Texas lawsuit, which multiple lawyers have said is very well-written. For any of you who don't think fraud was committed or election laws were broken, watch this:
The analysis comes from Dr. Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D, a member of Pacific Economics Group, a senior advisor to Pacific Economics Group Research, and a Professor of Economics at the University of Southern California.
Texas lawsuit - expert witness gave Biden a 1 in a quadrillion chance of winning those swing states based on real statistical analysis. Sounds like a winner to me, and SCOTUS asking for the Defendant's response by Thursday is a sign they see this case having merit.
The analysis comes from Dr. Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D, a member of Pacific Economics Group, a senior advisor to Pacific Economics Group Research, and a Professor of Economics at the University of Southern California.
From your link: Cicchetti's analysis was described by Justin Grimmer, a professor of political science at Stanford University and senior fellow of the Hoover Institution, as "based on an embarrassing and basic error in statistical reasoning."[3]
From your link: Cicchetti's analysis was described by Justin Grimmer, a professor of political science at Stanford University and senior fellow of the Hoover Institution, as "based on an embarrassing and basic error in statistical reasoning."[3]
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
