Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A chance of succeeding? Since when did a state get to dictate how another state runs their election? What would you be saying right now if Democrats tried to go after states Biden didn't win using the same inane theory?
if biden wants to, he is free to. the problem is if the state in question cheats, it affects us all
The State of Michigan's Brief in Opposition includes a succinct, easy to understand introduction that gives reason to why the Supreme Court shouldn't (and isn't likely) to hear this case. It sums it up beautifully.
Quote:
STATE OF MICHIGAN’S BRIEF IN
OPPOSITION
INTRODUCTION
The Constitution has entrusted the states to determine
their electors in a presidential election. Consistent
with Michigan law, the State of Michigan has
certified its presidential vote and the election in Michigan
is over. The challenge here is an unprecedented
one, without factual foundation or a valid legal basis.
This Court should summarily dismiss the motion to
file the bill of complaint. To do otherwise would make
this Court the arbiter of all future national elections.
The State of Michigan's Brief in Opposition includes a succinct, easy to understand introduction that gives reason to why the Supreme Court shouldn't (and isn't likely) to hear this case. It sums it up beautifully.
Sadly yes. Like certain diseases, he just won't go away. And the stupid news media and the morons who follow him will give him the attention he craves.
He is a sick disgusting ugly fat narcissistic loser, elected incredibly to be president by the 70 million morons in America.
The lawsuit itself does not make specific fraud allegations, instead focusing on changes made by the four states to voting procedures amid the coronavirus pandemic to expand mail-in voting. Texas said those changes removed protections against fraud and were unlawful when the reforms were made by officials in the four states or courts without the approval of the states legislatures.
Legal experts have said the lawsuit has little chance of succeeding and have questioned whether Texas has the legal standing to challenge election procedures in other states.
The states changed the laws without legislature approval.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
