Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So what? Courts and judges get it wrong all the time and are often highly political. Why do you think we have all these levels of courts...it's a check and balance. Lower court judges are often the worst, which is why they're in the lower court
That's not much of an argument, the Supreme Court hears a fraction of a percent so that doesn't hold much water. We have District Courts, Appeals Courts, State Courts yet all got it wrong because Trump lost.
The Supreme Court will settle this shortly, will you agree with the outcome or do they become part of this conspiracy.
The MSM has brainwashed so many people to the point that logic has no meaning anymore. Even judges are highly political and biased. I blame the media including Big Tech.
Yes let’s add the MSM and Big Tech to the international conspiracy involving dominion flipping ballots, stolen ballots, dead people voting, fake ballots trucked in,Iran ,Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, soros ,the clintons ,the cia ,fbi ,DOJ ,Germany ,Republican and democratic judges on the county state and federal level all plotting to steal the election from Donald trump.
Those states violated their own Constitutions. You can complain all you want, but the laws were broken and diluted the entire vote of this country. Blame them for not following the law and creating this election debacle; it's 100% their fault.
I don’t think that is true but even if it were These states have republican legislature so if you believe they acted in good faith and the voters acted in good faith the remedy cannot be to disenfranchise millions of voters. The judges keep ruling this.
What Texas is doing in this proceeding is to ask this court to reconsider a mass of baseless claims about problems with the election that have already been considered, and rejected, by this court and other court.
This is going to be more baseless garbage tossed out and dismissed.
Actually it's easy to prove the states in the law suit violated the constitution when the state executive branches rewrote election laws. Violating the constitution is ok just to win an election?
I disagree. Their "state matter" affected the outcome of an election to appoint federal roles, which oversee all 50 states. That's the whole premise of this Texas (+ 19 state) lawsuit.
You can disagree all you want, but it is a state matter. Texas has to show that it was harmed, and that means that Texas has to prove fraud and fraud to the point that it CHANGED the outcome of the race. There is no such evidence, or we would have seen it in one of the dozens of earlier lawsuits. This is a weak lawsuit, without any real substance. But it makes all the Trump supporters in those states feel like their states are doing something, so the politicians are engaging in political grandstanding.
Actually it's easy to prove the states in the law suit violated the constitution when the state executive branches rewrote election laws. Violating the constitution is ok just to win an election?
If it's so east to prove why haven't they won a single case out of 50.
ALL that this does is underscore to the court that this is political grandstanding of a very partisan nature. It doesn't really engage the courts at all. But Trump supporters seem to think it accomplishes something.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.