Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-18-2020, 08:13 AM
 
1,348 posts, read 773,997 times
Reputation: 824

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
The Pubs say they have 1,000 sworn affidavits from election workers who witnessed election fraud.

Why won't the courts listen to what these people have to say?
Cowardice and corruption.

 
Old 12-18-2020, 08:35 AM
 
26,546 posts, read 14,376,018 times
Reputation: 7405
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
14 mins 59 secs.......

yep. gotta love someone that slaps their moment of fame onto their own shirt.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 08:48 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,355 posts, read 16,298,749 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanyBelle View Post
Where was all the fraud proved? Again I say if there was fraud in the 2020 election, I'm all for finding out sooner than later. Why won't the Trump campaign prove the fraud????


Reps to you!
 
Old 12-18-2020, 09:10 AM
 
51,604 posts, read 25,617,156 times
Reputation: 37792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thulsa View Post
I don't totally agree. Ramsland was a troll that set out to make trouble with no regard to the truth, and in that he succeeded. Sadly, there will be people who quote his paper for years to come.
Bingo.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 09:25 AM
 
29,987 posts, read 18,561,772 times
Reputation: 20763
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
And yet this secret video evidence was not presented to any judge in any case so far.

All of this evidence and all they have presented to any court is hearsay and expert testimony that confuses which states they are discussing.
So which judge has chosen to hear this testimony?
 
Old 12-18-2020, 09:26 AM
 
26,546 posts, read 14,376,018 times
Reputation: 7405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thulsa View Post
Sadly, there will be people who quote his paper for years to come.

yep.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,148,442 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
So which judge has chosen to hear this testimony?
Judges can only hear what is presented by the attorneys. Team Trumps attorneys have not presented this evidence to any court. The cases where they have presented their "evidence" the judges, including Trump appointees" have slapped it down due to being fictional, or hearsay.

You too can read the case filings and the judges remarks, there are even transcripts of the hearings in front of the judges that are available if you want to learn the facts.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 09:46 AM
 
13,269 posts, read 8,378,222 times
Reputation: 31471
Video taping or recording while employed under contract. Hmmmm....pretty sure that is a no no . Spy cam? Where did she get the warrant to spy?

But this is a person with a criminal record. Let her hang herself (metaphorically) with this supposedly unedited tape *cough*.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 09:48 AM
 
5,312 posts, read 2,097,364 times
Reputation: 2570
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
So which judge has chosen to hear this testimony?
Hmmm...might have been useful as part of her affidavit. That affidavit has been used in at least one case. The judge didn't find her credible since no one else mentioned things like machines jamming regularly, etc. in their affidavits and so on. Things that would have been easily noticeable.
 
Old 12-18-2020, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,056,604 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
What you're asking for can't be done, period, as you state above. This process is nothing new or unique to 2020. Why didn't GA's fully GOP controlled state government fix these "issues" before the election?

The hand recount DID prove that Dominion machines weren't surreptitiously changing people's votes, however. I fully expect the hand recount of paper ballots in Antrim County to show the exact same thing. What will you say then?
What I've been saying all along. The push for legitimacy needs to start at registration, and actual voting, along with accurate, properly monitored counting. There are severe shortcomings when it comes to voter verification and handling of ballots, thumb drives, whatever, allowing the process to be questioned. If we can eliminate the possibility of fraud, it should make everybody happy, as long as everybody legally allowed to vote can do so. There is no reason it can't be done. 2020 is done. Too late even if there was enough fraudulent voting to make a difference. the way things were run, there is no way to be sure one way or the other. I'm just asking to end the doubt in future elections.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top