Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,563 posts, read 12,525,568 times
Reputation: 10475
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMESMH
The bolded is a rationalization of Trump’s unpresidential behavior. if Joe Sixpack attacks someone verbally, after being attacked.....people don’t give it a second thought. Many people won’t expect mature, ‘bigger person’ behavior from the average citizen/Joe Sixpack. On the contrary, many people expect better behavior, presidential behavior, from their President.
You aren’t being called ‘Mr. Lysol’.
No one in your family is being called ‘Mr. Lysol’.
No personal friend of yours is being called ‘Mr. Lysol’.
Trump is a politician.
A politician is being called ‘Mr. Lysol’.
Why do you care if someone calls Trump ‘Mr. Lysol’ ?
Why do you feel such a need to defend Trump?
Why do you take criticism of him so personally? He’s not your brother, son, uncle, father, grandfather, nor a personal friend.
So you were cool with "birtherism", lol, no you weren't.
So you were cool with "birtherism", lol, no you weren't.
A president is entitled to some respect whether you like him or not. Juvenile name calling is unacceptable whether or not they are a personal friend or relative of yours especially in a forum where you are suppose to have civil discussions and especially if a certain label that is put on someone is completely false! I grew up long ago far too many in this forum have not and they are usually those on the left.
It's like lefty's want to ***** about the wall by talking about anything other than the wall.
The wall system works.
It's usually because they have a vested interest in illegal immigration why they b*tch about the wall. They don't want the flow to stop. They use lame arguments all the time like it's too expensive (debunked) or that it doesn't work (debunked), etc. Their transparency is pretty obvious. No one is saying that the wall is the only solution but it certainly is a significant part of the solution.
It's usually because they have a vested interest in illegal immigration why they b*tch about the wall. They don't want the flow to stop. They use lame arguments all the time like it's too expensive (debunked) or that it doesn't work (debunked), etc. Their transparency is pretty obvious. No one is saying that the wall is the only solution but it certainly is a significant part of the solution.
I see the pro-illegal, anti-wall people gave up trying to defend their nonsense on this topic. Go figure.
If that's the case I remember the man broke both legs trying to climb over the wall. Next.......
And? How many more made it over or under? Or better yet, came in through the other 48 U.S./Mexico border crossings with its 330 ports of entry? You really think one broken leg is a great deterrent? Maybe you should research something outside of your partisan spoon fed bubble.
Awhile back 60 Minutes did a piece on the border wall built over a tunnel that allows raw sewage and other pollution to enter the United States from the Tijuana river. You can see a picture of it in the article from CBS NEWS: "Raw sewage flowing into the Tijuana River brings toxic sludge to California."
You can clearly just walk through the tunnel into the United States when the river is low.
So a question. When you run on a hate fueled fear mongering need a boogeyman to defeat platform. What do you think is easier? Build a wall and sell that concept as a cure all rather than dealing with an internal problem that both sides have used as a political football, or actually fix the problem internally?
After 4 years and wasted tax payer dollars has the 11 million illegals just magically disappeared? Ah nope. Has it stopped the thousands coming from South America seeking asylum? Ah nope.
So you want to clap for dear leader for stopping a few from crossing with the billions of dollars spent to do so when the wall has done nothing to fix the illegal internal problem? Really?
And? How many more made it over or under? Or better yet, came in through the other 48 U.S./Mexico border crossings with its 330 ports of entry? You really think one broken leg is a great deterrent? Maybe you should research something outside of your partisan spoon fed bubble.
Awhile back 60 Minutes did a piece on the border wall built over a tunnel that allows raw sewage and other pollution to enter the United States from the Tijuana river. You can see a picture of it in the article from CBS NEWS: "Raw sewage flowing into the Tijuana River brings toxic sludge to California."
You can clearly just walk through the tunnel into the United States when the river is low.
So a question. When you run on a hate fueled fear mongering need a boogeyman to defeat platform. What do you think is easier? Build a wall and sell that concept as a cure all rather than dealing with an internal problem that both sides have used as a political football, or actually fix the problem internally?
After 4 years and wasted tax payer dollars has the 11 million illegals just magically disappeared? Ah nope. Has it stopped the thousands coming from South America seeking asylum? Ah nope.
So you want to clap for dear leader for stopping a few from crossing with the billions of dollars spent to do so when the wall has done nothing to fix the illegal internal problem? Really?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.