Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
TRANSLATION: I can't refute anything the OP said, but I hate it anyway, and I'm desperate to cover up for the Democrats. So I'll call names and hurl smears, and hope that somebody believes me somewhere.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moving415
All from Zerohedge, a far-right financial blog. Enough said. Let's move on.
TRANSLATION: I hate it too, and am just as desperate to cover up the truth. But since I can't refute the message either, I'll attack the messenger instead, and hope someone believes he said something wrong even though I can't produce any evidence of that. It's all I've got.
So he has had no access to the machines, yet claims to know 6 very detailed things about the machines, and another 10 things based upon his knowledge of the first 6 things.
Talk about a house of cards.
Also, if this guy is the smartest guy in the room, why did he wait until now to join the team? The safe harbor date has passed, states have certified electors, the Republicans have lost 60 of 61 lawsuits, and it is all over except the ceremonial opening of the envelopes on Wednesday. The smartest person in the room would know itsover.
Its impossible to win an election lawsuit now, or even have them heard, because courts are reluctant to interfere with election results after the controversy of Bush-Gore. No judge wants to be known for altering the result of an election, whether its warranted or not. Whereas lawsuits just before an election, are more likely to succeed.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sumerian_Summer
I thought we were suppose to "trust the experts".This guy seems like an expert in computers and has presented evidence of voting fraud on the computerized voting machines. Will anyone listen?
"seems like an expert"?
Would you have surgery performed by someone 'who seems' like he knows what he's doing?
And as far as "presented evidence" goes. Let us know when he presents this 'evidence' under oath and penalty of criminal perjury charges.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAGAalot
Its impossible to win an election lawsuit now, or even have them heard, because courts are reluctant to interfere with election results after the controversy of Bush-Gore. No judge wants to be known for altering the result of an election, whether its warranted or not. Whereas lawsuits just before an election, are more likely to succeed.
Thankfully, they're also reluctant to hear cases based on nothing but hearsay, baseless allegation, innuendo, and what would kindly be known as sour grapes or unkindly as BS.
So are you going to say the more eductaed is the more correct? Doubt that is a hill you want to die on.
I noticed that nobody is questioning referring to him as "Dr" despite "only" having a doctorate in education. Curious.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
