Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think somebody in the white house leaked the call. It's very clear on the president's side and the SOS sounds like the foreground.
I read that the SOS told staff he would not release it unless Trump went after him about it on Twitter, which Trump did (of course) and it's completely legal in Georgia only one party has to give permission to record a call.
I just listened to the recording. Clearly, Trump is terrified of what awaits for him on January 21st. Even if he tries to pardon himself (which the justice department is simply not going to accept - it's up to Biden, but there are most definitely grounds to try him for criminal actions, trying to threaten the Ga sec of state to commit election fraud), NY State is waiting for him, getting his cell ready.
I am sure that this is why he just recently replaced every civilian position in the Pentagon with unqualified Trump loyalists. He's going to try to pull a military coup, before Jan 20th. I don't think that he will succeed, but he's finally realizing that it's his last option.
This is much, much bigger than Watergate. This is the most criminal, treasonous act that a US president has ever committed. Trump just asked, pressured, and then threatened a state secretary, in an attempt to force him to commit mass election fraud, in order to overturn a valid election that went overwhelmingly against him.
I read that the SOS told staff he would not release it unless Trump went after him about it on Twitter, which Trump did (of course) and it's completely legal in Georgia only one party has to give permission to record a call.
Trump is so clear it sounds like he is standing in the room.
Last edited by AfriqueNY; 01-03-2021 at 10:07 PM..
Reason: Spelling
Once you get to the # necessary to overturn, there are probably thousands more that would go in the same direction. Not the opposite.
I agree, but that's beside the point. If they want to count all the votes, then they should want to count all the votes. He clearly isn't interested in making sure all the ballots are legit. Just the ones for him, just enough for him to win.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
) and MI and AZ, etc. do it?
