Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You won't hear this reported on CNN and Twitter may ban you for posting about it.
Quote:
The state of Wisconsin has announced that it will introduce a resolution on Thursday morning to decertify the state’s electoral college votes and award them to President Trump.
You won't hear this reported on CNN and Twitter may ban you for posting about it.
There is a reason why reliable sources aren't reporting this, that is why you need to use the Gateway Pundit.
So they are introducing a resolution on Thursday while the electoral college will be decided tomorrow, did you or those nutty congressmen think this through.
There is a reason why reliable sources aren't reporting this, that is why you need to use the Gateway Pundit.
So they are introducing a resolution on Thursday while the electoral college will be decided tomorrow, did you or those nutty congressmen think this through.
Good!
The Constitutional date of no return is when, exactly?
Jan 6th, is just the first day, harm can be proven to have "standing" in the courts. The very standing that they have denied until harm can be established. No harm, no foul... yet.... Tomorrow, we find out if it is Donald or Joe that is going to be pissed off and harmed.
CNN did tell you, that Pence is kicking it back to the disputed State Legislatures.....
Good!
The Constitutional date of no return is when, exactly?
Jan 6th, is just the first day, harm can be proven to have "standing" in the courts. The very standing that they have denied until harm can be established. No harm, no foul... yet.... Tomorrow, we find out if it is Donald or Joe that is going to be pissed off and harmed.
CNN did tell you, that Pence is kicking it back to the disputed State Legislatures.....
Those circumstances of departure from the letter of the law include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Clerks provided absentee ballots to electors without applications, as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.86.
2. Clerks and deputy clerks authorized by the municipal clerk failed to write on the official ballot, in the space for official endorsement, the clerk's initials and official title, as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (1).
3. Clerks issued absentee ballots to electors who were required to enclose a copy of proof of identification or an authorized substitute document, but who failed to do so under Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (1).
4. Clerks failed to enter initials on ballot envelopes indicating whether the elector is exempt from providing proof of identification, as required by Wis. Stat. §6.87 (2).
5. Clerks in Milwaukee and Dane Counties declared electors in their counties to be “indefinitely confined” under Wis. Stat. § 6.86 (2), causing chaos and confusion, and failed to keep current the mailing list established under that subsection; more than 215,000 electors thus avoided identification requirements and safeguards that
18the legislature has established.
6. Clerks and the boards of canvassers permitted absentee ballots returned without the required witness address under Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (2) to be counted in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (6d).
7. Clerks who received absentee ballots with improperly completed certificates or no certificates filled in missing information in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87
8. The Wisconsin Elections Commission, in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.875, barred special voting deputies from entering qualified nursing homes and assisted living facilities, instead mailing ballots to residents directly, thereby avoiding safeguards the legislature put in place to protect our most vulnerable citizens and loved ones.
9. The clerk of the City of Madison ignored Wis. Stat. § 6.855 and created an event named “Democracy in the Park” and, of her own accord, designated alternate sites where absentee ballots could be collected; these ballots were counted in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (6)
In 1920, Virginia voted against the 19th Amendment. It still became law since enough states voted for it. Finally, in 1952 VA voted to approve it. How far back are they now going to go in WI on changing their minds?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
