Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2021, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Holly Springs, NC USA
3,457 posts, read 4,653,220 times
Reputation: 1907

Advertisements

Why have rules banning certain types of speech if you only selectively apply them?

 
Old 01-11-2021, 06:56 AM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,073,833 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by SandraMoore66 View Post
Ha! So according to your own post the government should force these companies to treat us all equally.
So that baker should be forced to bake that wedding cake for that gay couple, right? Is that what you want?
 
Old 01-11-2021, 06:57 AM
 
4,067 posts, read 2,273,306 times
Reputation: 4384
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoSox 15 View Post
Oh so we're clear - it's ok to discriminate against businesses? Some have one set of rules while the other have another set.

What's the argument again?
Let's just drop the bakery, that was a bad comparison. How is that no one can address the discrepancies on the rules for these big social media companies.
 
Old 01-11-2021, 06:58 AM
 
4,067 posts, read 2,273,306 times
Reputation: 4384
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
So that baker should be forced to bake that wedding cake for that gay couple, right? Is that what you want?
Apparently you didn't read the rest of my posts...
 
Old 01-11-2021, 06:58 AM
 
7,269 posts, read 4,212,399 times
Reputation: 5466
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoSox 15 View Post
The equal protection clause, like the Constitution itself, limits the power of GOVERNMENT. It has zero to do with private commerce. The text states: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The basis of the amendment was to protect slaves from unequal treatment by the states and why during Jim Crow the phrase "Separate but equal" was used.

In any event this has absolutely zero to do with Twitter making a business decision. Sure Trump could sue in civil court for any monetary damages but, like with all civil cases, he would have to prove them.

Twitter has become a public utility and certainly has a double standard when it comes to liberal vs. conservative speech.
 
Old 01-11-2021, 06:59 AM
 
4,067 posts, read 2,273,306 times
Reputation: 4384
Quote:
Originally Posted by bighouse9 View Post
why have rules banning certain types of speech if you only selectively apply them?
thank youuuuuu!
 
Old 01-11-2021, 07:01 AM
 
1,198 posts, read 1,625,652 times
Reputation: 2435
The issue here is not the enforcement against violent rhetoric, the issue here is the painting of conservative voices as inherently dangerous or violent. Violent rhetoric should, under no circumstances, be allowed, but only a small portion of the fringe left or right espouses violent views. The remainder should have an equal platform to express and debate those views without interference from the platform.

I have said this several times on these threads and it's been ignored-protect your own rights to free speech by protecting the rights of others, including those with dissenting views. It's easy to do a victory lap when you perceive your enemy as being silenced, but if history is any indication, what follows afterwards is tragic and the country is never the same again. No one will benefit from it in the long run.
 
Old 01-11-2021, 07:05 AM
 
29,481 posts, read 14,643,964 times
Reputation: 14443
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJmmadude View Post
The issue here is not the enforcement against violent rhetoric, the issue here is the painting of conservative voices as inherently dangerous or violent. Violent rhetoric should, under no circumstances, be allowed, but only a small portion of the fringe left or right espouses violent views. The remainder should have an equal platform to express and debate those views without interference from the platform.

I have said this several times on these threads and it's been ignored-protect your own rights to free speech by protecting the rights of others, including those with dissenting views. It's easy to do a victory lap when you perceive your enemy as being silenced, but if history is any indication, what follows afterwards is tragic and the country is never the same again. No one will benefit from it in the long run.
Exactly. The left has just been so consumed by hate that they could never do this.
 
Old 01-11-2021, 07:06 AM
 
4,067 posts, read 2,273,306 times
Reputation: 4384
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJmmadude View Post
The issue here is not the enforcement against violent rhetoric, the issue here is the painting of conservative voices as inherently dangerous or violent. Violent rhetoric should, under no circumstances, be allowed, but only a small portion of the fringe left or right espouses violent views. The remainder should have an equal platform to express and debate those views without interference from the platform.

I have said this several times on these threads and it's been ignored-protect your own rights to free speech by protecting the rights of others, including those with dissenting views. It's easy to do a victory lap when you perceive your enemy as being silenced, but if history is any indication, what follows afterwards is tragic and the country is never the same again. No one will benefit from it in the long run.
I can't imagine anyone disagreeing with you on this, however that is not what is happening on these sites. They need to BAN all violent rhetoric.
 
Old 01-11-2021, 07:15 AM
 
29,481 posts, read 14,643,964 times
Reputation: 14443
Apparently doxing and calling for militant action is okay on twitter....as long as it's coming from the left.

https://twitter.com/NYCAntifa
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top