Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-16-2021, 01:46 PM
 
7,141 posts, read 4,736,438 times
Reputation: 6490

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Exactly. About 29% of the general public still support trump and about 18% of the general public approve of the domestic terrorism carried out at the capitol. That’s a large number of psychotic people.
Link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2021, 01:46 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,718 posts, read 7,597,559 times
Reputation: 14988
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBT1980 View Post
American Thinker already admitted it was all lies about the dominion and election fraud.

That ship has sailed.
So none of these things, and the hundreds more like them, ever actually happened?

-----------------------------------------

Democrats keep repeating "There's no evidence of election fraud!" Oh, really? How many examples would you like?

Sworn testimony from eyewitnesses, affidavits sworn under penalty of perjury, videos, etc. etc.

This post could be hundreds of pages long. Here are just a few examples. You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...0Authority.pdf
Quote:
11. In Michigan, a preliminary report, conducted by Russell James Ramsland, Jr. of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC (“ASOG”), summarizing the results of ASOG’s court-ordered forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems equipment used in Antrim County, Michigan, was released on December 14, 2020. A copy of this report is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The report delivers the following preliminary conclusion:

We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.

Exh. A, ¶ B(2), p. 1. This Interim Report finds that the Dominion software was updated between the November 3, 2020 election and the subsequent recounts and that the updated software inexplicably produced wildly different results from the election day version. Id. at ¶ B(3), p. 2.
....to provide just one example among hundreds.

As usual, liberals have claimed a "hand recount" of paper ballots (which were printed out after voting by the same voting machines under investigation, not by the voters) somehow cleared the Dominion voting machines.

* Does that mean that it is no longer true that records and logs are missing?

* Does it mean that the machines no longer put out wildly differing counts before and after a firmware upgrade?

* Does it mean that logs produced during the forensic analysis no longer showed that a section of code that deliberately weighed Biden votes differently from Trump votes was active and running during the election and subsequent counting?

They seem to be claiming that these things are somehow "no longer true". No explanation for this has been given.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At State Farm Arena in Atlanta, GA on the day of the election, Surveillance video showed workers counting ballots with Republican and Democrat observers present.

At time tick 10:40 in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q9cSboHHS8
attorney Jacki Pick shows the video and narrates it.

At approx. 11:00PM, a woman with long blonde hair is seen talking to a number of the workers and observers. Shortly afterward, all the observers and most of the workers are seen turning and heading for the exit, except for four workers who stayed. Witnesses have described in sworn statements that the woman with long blonde hair had told everyone that everyone was quitting for the night and would resume ballot-counting etc. the following morning.

But the GA Secretary of State’s office later said that no one had told them they were quitting for the night, and that everyone should leave.

"We have launched an investigation into why the monitors from the political parties left before scanning ended," the secretary of state's office said. "While it was their right to leave early, we want to make certain they were not misled into thinking scanning had stopped for the night when it had not."
https://www.thecentersquare.com/geor...598f7c336.html

The Secretary of State’s representative making this statement was not sworn to tell the truth, unlike witnesses who WERE sworn and made statements saying they WERE told that everybody was to leave.

Atlanta election officials have since said that the videos show “normal ballot procedures”, as though counting ballots after sending the observers out of the room, in flat violation of Georgia law, was somehow “normal”.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rudy Giuliani gave a press conference on Nov. 19, 2020 in which he described various direct evidence of fraud. 60 different people swore out affidavits, under penalty of perjury, that they had volunteered to come to the ballot-counting rooms to observe the counting and tabulating of ballots; and that they had been physically prevented from doing so, in violation of state laws.

Fast forward this video to the 12:40 mark and listen to hear it.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?478246...plans-lawsuits

Giuliani also mentioned a woman in Michigan named Jessie Jacob whose job was to collect mail-in ballots, who signed a similar affidavit (again under penalty of perjury) that her supervisor had ordered her and the other employees to deliberately falsify the date on the mail-in ballots, to reflect an earlier date than the actual date they were mailed. Again in flat violation of Michigan state election law.
See the above video at 16:20 to hear about it.

Giuliani has dozens of other sworn affidavits from other employees, volunteers etc. describing illegal behavior with ballots. Being sworn before an office of the court, under threat of the penalty for perjury, these are all direct evidence of violations of election law and ballot fraud. Giuliani and the rest of Trump’s legal team are collecting more and more such evidence as time goes on.

So much for endless repetitions of "There isn't any evidence". You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).

Leftists who keep insisting there is “no evidence of fraud or election lawbreaking”, are either astoundingly ignorant of the truth, or are aware of the truth and are lying to you, trying to fool you into believing there is none.

----------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 01:50 PM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,795,443 times
Reputation: 15325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Leading up to Biden inaugural, DC has been turned into an occupied military zone like Baghdad. Are Dems that afraid?


How many National Guard troops are usually brought in for past Presidential inaugurations?

Now you can't get in or out without the far-left litany, "Your papers, please!" from armed troops.

All this while the FBI is discovering that Democrat's hasty one-day impeachment of President Trump was completely baseless: The attack on the capitol building by members of the Left and Right, was planned days (if not weeks) before Trump gave any of his speeches or tweets that day.

Is this what we can look forward to as Democrats tighten their grip on unchecked power in the Federal government? Especially as more and more normal Americans turn away from them with their increasing far-left laws, taxes, and restrictions?

------------------------------------

https://federalinquirer.com/green-zo...-to-be-closed/

Biden Inaugural Like Baghdad: Green Zone, Red Zone, Military Checkpoints to Enter and Leave Downtown D.C., Bridges Into City to Be Closed

January 15, 2021

In the days leading up to the Biden inaugural, the nation’s capital has been turned into an occupied military zone like Baghdad. Armed troops authorized to use lethal force are manning checkpoints to enter and leave downtown Washington, D.C. Green Zone and and Red Zone perimeters have been established. Several bridges into the city from neighboring Virginia are scheduled to be closed next week for the inaugural.

Sean Spicer, President Trump’s first press secretary and current Newsmax TV host, posted video apparently taken Friday night that shows a military checkpoint to leave D.C. near the Lincoln Memorial. The video also shows cars on 16th Street near K Street parked in rows blockading the roadway. But first, a scene-setter report by Spicer’s Newsmax co-host Lyndsay Keith from 16th and K in the daytime.

Washington D.C. remains locked down with barricades and thousands of National Guard troops, @LyndsayMKeith reports. https://t.co/VlT7z8drtO pic.twitter.com/lD8ghb8GCv — Newsmax (@newsmax) January 15, 2021

Spicer’s nighttime video: Washington DC or Baghdad? Troops asking to see ID before you can LEAVE the city. Unreal. @seanspicer pic.twitter.com/W3EeXKhkGq
Yes, I'm that afraid. When you have crazy people with guns, it's good to be afraid and careful. Nobody needs to prove their bravado. Just keep everybody safe. That's all I care about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,177 posts, read 19,179,477 times
Reputation: 14880
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Not afraid. Just ready to gun down terrorists.
They're being issued live ammo, too. This is not a drill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 01:51 PM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,795,443 times
Reputation: 15325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
So none of these things, and the hundreds more like them, ever actually happened?

-----------------------------------------

Democrats keep repeating "There's no evidence of election fraud!" Oh, really? How many examples would you like?

Sworn testimony from eyewitnesses, affidavits sworn under penalty of perjury, videos, etc. etc.

This post could be hundreds of pages long. Here are just a few examples. You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...0Authority.pdf
Quote:
11. In Michigan, a preliminary report, conducted by Russell James Ramsland, Jr. of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC (“ASOG”), summarizing the results of ASOG’s court-ordered forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems equipment used in Antrim County, Michigan, was released on December 14, 2020. A copy of this report is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The report delivers the following preliminary conclusion:

We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.

Exh. A, ¶ B(2), p. 1. This Interim Report finds that the Dominion software was updated between the November 3, 2020 election and the subsequent recounts and that the updated software inexplicably produced wildly different results from the election day version. Id. at ¶ B(3), p. 2.
....to provide just one example among hundreds.

As usual, liberals have claimed a "hand recount" of paper ballots (which were printed out after voting by the same voting machines under investigation, not by the voters) somehow cleared the Dominion voting machines.

* Does that mean that it is no longer true that records and logs are missing?

* Does it mean that the machines no longer put out wildly differing counts before and after a firmware upgrade?

* Does it mean that logs produced during the forensic analysis no longer showed that a section of code that deliberately weighed Biden votes differently from Trump votes was active and running during the election and subsequent counting?

They seem to be claiming that these things are somehow "no longer true". No explanation for this has been given.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At State Farm Arena in Atlanta, GA on the day of the election, Surveillance video showed workers counting ballots with Republican and Democrat observers present.

At time tick 10:40 in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q9cSboHHS8
attorney Jacki Pick shows the video and narrates it.

At approx. 11:00PM, a woman with long blonde hair is seen talking to a number of the workers and observers. Shortly afterward, all the observers and most of the workers are seen turning and heading for the exit, except for four workers who stayed. Witnesses have described in sworn statements that the woman with long blonde hair had told everyone that everyone was quitting for the night and would resume ballot-counting etc. the following morning.

But the GA Secretary of State’s office later said that no one had told them they were quitting for the night, and that everyone should leave.

"We have launched an investigation into why the monitors from the political parties left before scanning ended," the secretary of state's office said. "While it was their right to leave early, we want to make certain they were not misled into thinking scanning had stopped for the night when it had not."
https://www.thecentersquare.com/geor...598f7c336.html

The Secretary of State’s representative making this statement was not sworn to tell the truth, unlike witnesses who WERE sworn and made statements saying they WERE told that everybody was to leave.

Atlanta election officials have since said that the videos show “normal ballot procedures”, as though counting ballots after sending the observers out of the room, in flat violation of Georgia law, was somehow “normal”.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rudy Giuliani gave a press conference on Nov. 19, 2020 in which he described various direct evidence of fraud. 60 different people swore out affidavits, under penalty of perjury, that they had volunteered to come to the ballot-counting rooms to observe the counting and tabulating of ballots; and that they had been physically prevented from doing so, in violation of state laws.

Fast forward this video to the 12:40 mark and listen to hear it.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?478246...plans-lawsuits

Giuliani also mentioned a woman in Michigan named Jessie Jacob whose job was to collect mail-in ballots, who signed a similar affidavit (again under penalty of perjury) that her supervisor had ordered her and the other employees to deliberately falsify the date on the mail-in ballots, to reflect an earlier date than the actual date they were mailed. Again in flat violation of Michigan state election law.
See the above video at 16:20 to hear about it.

Giuliani has dozens of other sworn affidavits from other employees, volunteers etc. describing illegal behavior with ballots. Being sworn before an office of the court, under threat of the penalty for perjury, these are all direct evidence of violations of election law and ballot fraud. Giuliani and the rest of Trump’s legal team are collecting more and more such evidence as time goes on.

So much for endless repetitions of "There isn't any evidence". You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).

Leftists who keep insisting there is “no evidence of fraud or election lawbreaking”, are either astoundingly ignorant of the truth, or are aware of the truth and are lying to you, trying to fool you into believing there is none.

----------------------------------------------------
You might want to stay on topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,177 posts, read 19,179,477 times
Reputation: 14880
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
So none of these things, and the hundreds more like them, ever actually happened?

-----------------------------------------

Democrats keep repeating "There's no evidence of election fraud!" Oh, really? How many examples would you like?

Sworn testimony from eyewitnesses, affidavits sworn under penalty of perjury, videos, etc. etc.

This post could be hundreds of pages long. Here are just a few examples. You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...0Authority.pdf
Quote:
11. In Michigan, a preliminary report, conducted by Russell James Ramsland, Jr. of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC (“ASOG”), summarizing the results of ASOG’s court-ordered forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems equipment used in Antrim County, Michigan, was released on December 14, 2020. A copy of this report is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The report delivers the following preliminary conclusion:

We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.

Exh. A, ¶ B(2), p. 1. This Interim Report finds that the Dominion software was updated between the November 3, 2020 election and the subsequent recounts and that the updated software inexplicably produced wildly different results from the election day version. Id. at ¶ B(3), p. 2.
....to provide just one example among hundreds.

As usual, liberals have claimed a "hand recount" of paper ballots (which were printed out after voting by the same voting machines under investigation, not by the voters) somehow cleared the Dominion voting machines.

* Does that mean that it is no longer true that records and logs are missing?

* Does it mean that the machines no longer put out wildly differing counts before and after a firmware upgrade?

* Does it mean that logs produced during the forensic analysis no longer showed that a section of code that deliberately weighed Biden votes differently from Trump votes was active and running during the election and subsequent counting?

They seem to be claiming that these things are somehow "no longer true". No explanation for this has been given.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At State Farm Arena in Atlanta, GA on the day of the election, Surveillance video showed workers counting ballots with Republican and Democrat observers present.

At time tick 10:40 in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q9cSboHHS8
attorney Jacki Pick shows the video and narrates it.

At approx. 11:00PM, a woman with long blonde hair is seen talking to a number of the workers and observers. Shortly afterward, all the observers and most of the workers are seen turning and heading for the exit, except for four workers who stayed. Witnesses have described in sworn statements that the woman with long blonde hair had told everyone that everyone was quitting for the night and would resume ballot-counting etc. the following morning.

But the GA Secretary of State’s office later said that no one had told them they were quitting for the night, and that everyone should leave.

"We have launched an investigation into why the monitors from the political parties left before scanning ended," the secretary of state's office said. "While it was their right to leave early, we want to make certain they were not misled into thinking scanning had stopped for the night when it had not."
https://www.thecentersquare.com/geor...598f7c336.html

The Secretary of State’s representative making this statement was not sworn to tell the truth, unlike witnesses who WERE sworn and made statements saying they WERE told that everybody was to leave.

Atlanta election officials have since said that the videos show “normal ballot procedures”, as though counting ballots after sending the observers out of the room, in flat violation of Georgia law, was somehow “normal”.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rudy Giuliani gave a press conference on Nov. 19, 2020 in which he described various direct evidence of fraud. 60 different people swore out affidavits, under penalty of perjury, that they had volunteered to come to the ballot-counting rooms to observe the counting and tabulating of ballots; and that they had been physically prevented from doing so, in violation of state laws.

Fast forward this video to the 12:40 mark and listen to hear it.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?478246...plans-lawsuits

Giuliani also mentioned a woman in Michigan named Jessie Jacob whose job was to collect mail-in ballots, who signed a similar affidavit (again under penalty of perjury) that her supervisor had ordered her and the other employees to deliberately falsify the date on the mail-in ballots, to reflect an earlier date than the actual date they were mailed. Again in flat violation of Michigan state election law.
See the above video at 16:20 to hear about it.

Giuliani has dozens of other sworn affidavits from other employees, volunteers etc. describing illegal behavior with ballots. Being sworn before an office of the court, under threat of the penalty for perjury, these are all direct evidence of violations of election law and ballot fraud. Giuliani and the rest of Trump’s legal team are collecting more and more such evidence as time goes on.

So much for endless repetitions of "There isn't any evidence". You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).

Leftists who keep insisting there is “no evidence of fraud or election lawbreaking”, are either astoundingly ignorant of the truth, or are aware of the truth and are lying to you, trying to fool you into believing there is none.

----------------------------------------------------
If there was evidence, it should have been presented in court. If it wasn't presented in court in 63 tries, it wasn't evidence. When the lead attorney goes into court and tells a judge point blank that "this isn't about fraud" when he went in to present a case about fraud, that means that even the lead attorney knows he is promoting nothing but bull****.

You can claim fraud all day, but unless you can prove it, no reasonable person will believe it exists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,453 posts, read 7,081,915 times
Reputation: 11699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
You lost. Cry more.



Funny coming from the side that's been crying for four years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,212 posts, read 22,344,773 times
Reputation: 23853
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post
If you need 20,000 troops to protect your inauguration from the public.....

You probably weren't elected by the public.
If all our government's security agencies say there is a serious domestic terrorism threat ty that's intended to happen during the inauguration, I would believe them.

I'm not elected by the public, but if I was, I would ever take a crazed shooter's ability to discern a Republican from a Democrat for granted when it comes to my safety. Everyone is nothing but a target to the crazies and God knows, there are plenty of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 02:11 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,718 posts, read 7,597,559 times
Reputation: 14988
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
If there was evidence, it should have been presented in court. If it wasn't presented in court in 63 tries, it wasn't evidence.
TRANSLATION: It doesn't matter what we Democrats did, nor how illegal or destructive it was. It only matter whether we got away with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 02:16 PM
Status: "I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out." (set 2 days ago)
 
35,607 posts, read 17,927,273 times
Reputation: 50631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
TRANSLATION: It doesn't matter what we Democrats did, nor how illegal or destructive it was. It only matter whether we got away with it.
The riots that occur during BLM protests will never occur at an event like an inauguration ceremony, and they will not attempt to assassinate a president. Because those rioters and looters are apolitical, from the standpoint of caring at all which way or the other the election goes. They want to riot in the streets, and they want merch.

That's why you didn't see BLM violence at Trump's inauguration. They don't care. The country doesn't have to protect it's leaders from BLM, like the country is having to foot an ENORMOUS bill, financially and emotionally, to keep the scum planning to disrupt from killing our lawmakers.

DPS has an undercover presence downtown in Austin right now, posing as rednecks and homeless people, so they fit right in and won't look suspicious. We'll see whether this all hands on deck effort will work to keep our beloved capitol safe in the hands of Trump's enraged tyrants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top