Parler now using Russian servers (Putin, Obama, states, world)

[bu2]

Originally Posted by Ringo1

If the Parler site hadn't been used to plan a violent insurrection - they wouldn't be shut down.

And it's nothing to do with free speech. But everything to do with a business owner being able to serve only who they want. WHICH, as I recall, Republicans have been fighting for

It wasn't. Most of the sometimes violent protest was planned on Facebook and Twitter.

It has been explained to you brain dead leftists over and over. Its about exemption from lawsuits. To get section 230 protection you should apply your rules evenly. Otherwise, you are a publisher and subject to lawsuits just like a New York Times. Twitter and Facebook want it both ways. They want to choose what to publish AND be exempt from lawsuits.

[bu2]

Originally Posted by erasure

How long?

Twenty years?

Ten?

Because back in the 90ies Russia was definitely in no position to have such goal in mind.

Au contraire - it was American target for disintegration and slow death under Clintons.

So quit making up your stories already.

Convenient, I understand, but not true.

Aren't the 80s calling and asking for their foreign policy back?

[Mad_Jasper]

Originally Posted by Bureaucat

Or at least Russian owned.

Seems appropriate

https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/20...ians-after-ban

Well, Amazon "suspended" Parler with no possibility to "cure" the alleged issues to avoid contractual termination clauses despite Parler removing a large percentage of offending posts and submitting a plan to implement AI in January 2021 in an effort to be more proactive.

With AmeriKan Big Tech conspiring against dissenting opinion, what are those that refuse to kneel supposed to do?

[No_Recess]

Originally Posted by Bureaucat

Or at least Russian owned.

Seems appropriate

https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/20...ians-after-ban

Ok, and?

[erasure]

Originally Posted by bu2

Aren't the 80s calling and asking for their foreign policy back?

Remind me please what were the foreign policies back in the 80ies...

[Bureaucat]

Originally Posted by erasure

How long?

Twenty years?

Ten?

Because back in the 90ies Russia was definitely in no position to have such goal in mind.

Au contraire - it was American target for disintegration and slow death under Clintons.

So quit making up your stories already.

Convenient, I understand, but not true.

At least since the Soviet Union broke up it’s been a goal of Russia to see America fracture.

[Boss]

Originally Posted by bu2

It wasn't. Most of the sometimes violent protest was planned on Facebook and Twitter.

It has been explained to you brain dead leftists over and over. Its about exemption from lawsuits. To get section 230 protection you should apply your rules evenly. Otherwise, you are a publisher and subject to lawsuits just like a New York Times. Twitter and Facebook want it both ways. They want to choose what to publish AND be exempt from lawsuits.

The Riot was planned on multiple platforms and the fools posted on those numerous platforms.

It was an attempted over throw of our Gov't by a sick man. Who lost the election.

[Frank DeForrest]

Originally Posted by Bureaucat

At least since the Soviet Union broke up it’s been a goal of Russia to see America fracture.

Yeah one fake facebook profile at a time give it rest

[erasure]

Originally Posted by Bureaucat

At least since the Soviet Union broke up it’s been a goal of Russia to see America fracture.

SAYS WHO?

Any proof?

[robr2]

Originally Posted by Bureaucat

At least since the Soviet Union broke up it’s been a goal of Russia to see America fracture.

It goes back to the formation of the Soviet Union so at least to 1922.