Some important stats:
https://ilsr.org/map-shows-how-well-...-dakota-works/
If you look at the map, wall street banks have a far smaller share of deposits in red states than in blue states.
This is also true for things like electricity where Nebraska leads in terms of elimination stock shares in their electric grid:
https://www.yesmagazine.org/economy/...-owned-energy/
And in general, individual power supplies and green energy:
https://energymonitor.ai/technology/...ar-power-surge
One state that has done best at distributing vaccines is West Virginia, and that is becasue they rely on local pharmacies, and no CVSs
https://twitter.com/stacyfmitchell/s...96302406266881
Republicans are infamous for their undying support of financial institutions and corporations, so why this discrepancy?
First let me say this is relative only, all states are struggling with the influence of investors in wall street. However on average it is places with republican leadership that are far less affected.
This comes down to rural vs urban divide.
It is not because they are red states, but because most rural states are red. The less urbanization means less regulations, cheaper land, and more investment from local suppliers.
For example, Vermont which very blue, but also very rural, doesn't have walmart or big-box retailers dominating their consumer economy:
https://ilsr.org/vermont-is-magic-blp-episode-46/
In the end, I think these stronger community economics decrease the need for stronger welfare or government intervention in the economy.
So while many democrats think republicans are dumb for voting against their own interests, I think seeing how the local economies differ show why people see welfare/regulations differently.