Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-24-2021, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,604,784 times
Reputation: 9169

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoBromhal View Post
are you under the impression that corporations buy when prices are high, or prices are low? Or are you saying (example) Google is buying homes in Silicon Valley so their new employees have a place to live?
I'm saying that when prices were low (2009-2012), the average buyer (one needing a mortgage) couldn't take advantage of the low prices, as they were outcompeted by cash offers from investors and corporations
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2021, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
25,737 posts, read 12,815,111 times
Reputation: 19305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lycanmaster View Post
As Ron Paul would argue:

End the Fed

The Central Banks with their near-zero and even negative interest rate policies have completing distorted the housing market.

This is where the massive inflation has occurred.

As I posted earlier, the government interferes with free market equilibrium. Gov't regs can create "bubbles" like they did in 2007.

In the case of manipulating interest rates, they are causing another housing valuation bubble, and they are also giving Americans the false impression that our national debt is affordable, when in fact, it is not.

If interest rates normalized, and we had to pay 5% on our national debt, it wouldn't take long before our entitlement payments & benefits would be in the danger zone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2021, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,073 posts, read 7,511,991 times
Reputation: 9798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
Build more homes. Reduce building code requirements so construction costs are reduced. I would start with those.
Go back to 2x4 exterior stud walls, remove insulation requirements, 14-2 wiring, 100 amp service, single pane windows, 82% efficiency gas furnances, remove water well restrictions as to number of wells in given area and distance to septics fields. Remove requirements for streets, sidewalks, underground utility lines, remove system development charges-homeowner installs at their cost and if they want them. Remove fire and police taxes. Remove setbacks. No minimum or maximum lot sizes, Unlimited street parking. No garage requirements. No roofing standard. No maximum occupancy limits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2021, 12:25 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,101 posts, read 18,269,535 times
Reputation: 34976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arya Stark View Post
That will reduce or plateau the value of currently built homes... facing push back from people who already own. So likely it won't happen.

Where I live, a small town, they did build a massive complex of 300 new homes.... they started at IMHO an insane $550 and are now up to $850 before they even got built.

I am also frustrated that when new homes are built they are usually just too big. In this day and age who needs a 5 bedroom 3 bath home?

They need to start building mini homes. 2 bedrooms, 1 bath.
Buy a lot and then build your 2/1. Quite simple. I did it and had a 3/2 built..1900 sq feet.
Plenty of build on your lot builders with plans that you can customize.
And no, you do not have to be rich to do that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2021, 12:25 PM
bu2
 
24,102 posts, read 14,885,315 times
Reputation: 12934
Quote:
Originally Posted by serger View Post
Housing is not cheap in TX, it used to be.

Combine that with very high property tax rates and the highest home insurance rates in the country.
Its still cheaper than the east or left coasts or big cities in the interior like Chicago and Denver.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2021, 12:30 PM
bu2
 
24,102 posts, read 14,885,315 times
Reputation: 12934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avondalist View Post
Just be thankful most of those nice new vehicles will end up on the resale market. Be thankful your neighbor paid the 40% new car premium for you.
And like with housing in many markets, government regulations are making new cars unaffordable for much of the middle class. With the Obama administration, which was anti-car, that was a side benefit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2021, 12:31 PM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,477 posts, read 11,559,641 times
Reputation: 11981
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
As I posted earlier, the government interferes with free market equilibrium. Gov't regs can create "bubbles" like they did in 2007.

In the case of manipulating interest rates, they are causing another housing valuation bubble, and they are also giving Americans the false impression that our national debt is affordable, when in fact, it is not.

If interest rates normalized, and we had to pay 5% on our national debt, it wouldn't take long before our entitlement payments & benefits would be in the danger zone.
Why do you think normalized interest rates are closer to 5%?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2021, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,215,541 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
In Austin, we've gone through a decade of housing prices soaring. What used to be cheap neighborhoods, have been replaced by very large, very modern homes that were built after scraping the 2/1 off the land. And those who inhabited the little house now are pushed out of the city, where there are still pockets of affordable houses.

The thing is, no one wants to build little cheap houses when they can build 850K houses. It would be really nice if builders who wanted to build 2/1s and 3/1s with limited expensive features, linoleum floors, were given a tax break to do so. There are families who VERY much want to buy a home, or single people, but there is no market and they don't need a monstrosity. Or they don't want to live in a million dollar condo downtown.
why does the owner of the little 2/1 teardown get pushed out of the city? They CHOSE to sell.

Do you understand the difference between fixed and marginal costs?

Between supply and demand? Or are these 850K homes just sitting there and not selling?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2021, 12:35 PM
bu2
 
24,102 posts, read 14,885,315 times
Reputation: 12934
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
Not true, sky. I was a college graduate, three years out of school, in a well paying field in Dallas and i could not afford to buy any house in the city a little over 30 years ago.
You're exaggerating. Now maybe you would not have wanted to live in those parts of Mesquite or Oak Cliff, but if you had the downpayment (usually the biggest issue), you could have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2021, 12:37 PM
 
7,241 posts, read 4,549,884 times
Reputation: 11927
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
As I posted earlier, the government interferes with free market equilibrium. Gov't regs can create "bubbles" like they did in 2007..
I suspect that was just a ruse so that real estate developers could take great profits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top