Do the supermajority of public really want silly Gun/2A regulations (generations, poll)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do the supermajority of the public really want silly Gun/2A regulations?
Nope.
But a "supermajority" does want firearm regulations. First, you have to define "supermajority". It isn't a statistical term. It could mean 55%, 60%, or 66.66666666666666666666666666%.
60% of US citizens want stricter firearm regulations
71% of US citizens want magazine limits.
69% of US citizens want the 94 AWB back.
88% of US citizens want private sales subject to background checks
But a "supermajority" does want firearm regulations. First, you have to define "supermajority". It isn't a statistical term. It could mean 55%, 60%, or 66.66666666666666666666666666%.
60% of US citizens want stricter firearm regulations
71% of US citizens want magazine limits.
69% of US citizens want the 94 AWB back.
88% of US citizens want private sales subject to background checks
60% of US citizens want stricter firearm regulations Perfect example of silly. Want less deaths due to firearms, address the root causes. Start enforcing the 2000 plus firearms laws we already have.
71% of US citizens want magazine limits. Perfect example of silly. Want less deaths due to firearms, address the root causes. Start enforcing the 2000 plus firearms laws we already have.
69% of US citizens want the 94 AWB back. Restricting a firearm over it's looks that gets used in homicides less than fists and knives is a perfect example of silly. Want less deaths due to firearms, address the root causes. Start enforcing the 2000 plus firearms laws we already have.
88% of US citizens want private sales subject to background checks This one will be tough to enforce, not that I have an issue with it.
A born with right? The 2A is obviously not a born with right, otherwise there wouldn't have been a need for it to be in the constitution.....
There's a need for it because there's always gonna be tyrants who want to control you. The 2a is there is there so we can tell the British, commies, and now the democrats to **** off. This right is clear as day yet people still constantly infringe way more than with any other right. Same people who try to invent "rights" aka free stuff out of nowhere want to claim actual rights don't matter.
But a "supermajority" does want firearm regulations. First, you have to define "supermajority". It isn't a statistical term. It could mean 55%, 60%, or 66.66666666666666666666666666%.
60% of US citizens want stricter firearm regulations
71% of US citizens want magazine limits.
69% of US citizens want the 94 AWB back.
88% of US citizens want private sales subject to background checks
Do any of these same people want us to actually punish law breakers? Do they want castle doctrine and stand your ground laws? 3 strikes? no ? Constitutional carry for any law abiding citizen? Or just more regulations that empower the criminals.
60% of US citizens want stricter firearm regulations Perfect example of silly. Want less deaths due to firearms, address the root causes. Start enforcing the 2000 plus firearms laws we already have.
71% of US citizens want magazine limits. Perfect example of silly. Want less deaths due to firearms, address the root causes. Start enforcing the 2000 plus firearms laws we already have.
69% of US citizens want the 94 AWB back. Restricting a firearm over it's looks that gets used in homicides less than fists and knives is a perfect example of silly. Want less deaths due to firearms, address the root causes. Start enforcing the 2000 plus firearms laws we already have.
88% of US citizens want private sales subject to background checks This one will be tough to enforce, not that I have an issue with it.
We'll need bg checks before anyone can vote as well. Also abolish all mail in votes. Allowing someone a vote who's too feeble, dumb, lazy, to turn in a ballot is just as dangerous as letting someone vote by mail and having some unknown party collect it for them.
K-Ho and M-O coming for your guns. All of them.
2022. Mark my words. It’s gonna happen.
Hide your guns.
Let's be honest. No one is coming for peoples firearms. They are just going to legislate them to the point where people don't want to be a felon, or can't afford them, or afford the ammo...etc. There are so many creative ways, for our elected officials to disarm the law abiding American public without touching the 2A.
And the anti gun people will just sit there and say " what's the problem, the 2A is still intact, no one came for your guns"...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
