Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2021, 12:02 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,874,717 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DXBtoFL View Post
Is this true?



Equality, as defined by the Constitution was equality of the law, that the law should not differentiate among Americans. The major progressive movements for the 19th and up till the 1960s was about ensuring the law treated all Americans equally and extending that protection to more and more different groups of people (different faiths, different races, different gender, and recently, different sexuality).
Equality wasn't defined by the Constitution. The original Constitution acknowledged slavery. The amendments abolishing slavery were added decades later and they did not define "equality". And decades ago, our laws acknowledged that abolishing slavery did not provide equality, that as a society we had built a system that embedded inequality into just about every aspect of daily life. As a society, that was not acceptable, and laws were passed to rid us of that systemic inequality.

References to what the Founding Fathers meant or what they envisioned is really not relevant. We as a nation have determined that the color of one's skin, or one's ethnicity, or one's gender, or a myriad of other characteristics, does not justify unequal treatment. When unequal treatment becomes evident, we address that unequal treatment to remedy it. We have to, because our principles demand it. Freedom and justice for all is just an empty phrase, unless we truly believe in freedom and justice for all, and are willing to enforce that principle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2021, 12:05 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13708
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
So people are not all created equal???
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
From the concept of unalienable rights they are but everyone is different. If say my older brother is more successful than me it doesn't mean I wasn't born equal or that he held me back, and there must be an intervention.
Exactly. It's why Mahomes has a $450 million contract to play football ...and I don't.

Kurt Vonnegut explored the theme of forcibly achieving equality of outcomes in a short story way back in 1961, only then it was considered dystopian science fiction. Today, lefty idiots want to live it.

Harrison Bergeron

Analysis and Summary of "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut


Didn't any of you study this in school? It's still in the curriculum in many places to this day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2021, 12:09 PM
 
26,787 posts, read 22,545,020 times
Reputation: 10038
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
So people are not all created equal???

Provided that they are "created" ( which implies the existence of God,) - no they are not.

If you look at what's going on in the world, how some countries are going through droughts and famines, through natural disasters time after time, with horrendous loss of life, if you look at people that live in such disastrous poverty and misery, while other nations are prospering - of course they are not *created equal."

I think that much is evident.



But that's again only, if we speak of "creation."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2021, 12:11 PM
 
26,787 posts, read 22,545,020 times
Reputation: 10038
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Equality wasn't defined by the Constitution. The original Constitution acknowledged slavery. The amendments abolishing slavery were added decades later and they did not define "equality". And decades ago, our laws acknowledged that abolishing slavery did not provide equality, that as a society we had built a system that embedded inequality into just about every aspect of daily life. As a society, that was not acceptable, and laws were passed to rid us of that systemic inequality.

References to what the Founding Fathers meant or what they envisioned is really not relevant. We as a nation have determined that the color of one's skin, or one's ethnicity, or one's gender, or a myriad of other characteristics, does not justify unequal treatment. When unequal treatment becomes evident, we address that unequal treatment to remedy it. We have to, because our principles demand it. Freedom and justice for all is just an empty phrase, unless we truly believe in freedom and justice for all, and are willing to enforce that principle.

Can you point exactly please where and how?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2021, 12:16 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,874,717 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by erasure View Post
Provided that they are "created" ( which implies the existence of God,) - no they are not.

If you look at what's going on in the world, how some countries are going through droughts and famines, through natural disasters time after time, with horrendous loss of life, if you look at people that live in such disastrous poverty and misery, while other nations are prospering - of course they are not *created equal."

I think that much is evident.



But that's again only, if we speak of "creation."
Created or not, the question is do we believe that race, religion, or other characteristics justify unequal treatment? If not, then the laws that our nation has passed to affirm equality are not a problem But if we believe that unequal treatment is justified, then the laws are a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2021, 12:16 PM
 
9,375 posts, read 6,975,888 times
Reputation: 14777
Equality of outcomes does not equal Equality of opportunity.

The left continues to misconstrue to 2.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2021, 12:17 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,564 posts, read 28,659,961 times
Reputation: 25154
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
You think that differences in outcomes are always the result of differences in effort????
If a person wants to make $100,000 a year, then that requires a different level of effort, knowledge and experience compared to a person making $50,000 a year.

Can we agree to that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2021, 12:18 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,874,717 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
If a person wants to make $100,000 a year, then that requires a different level of effort, knowledge and experience compared to a person making $50,000 a year.

Can we agree to that?
A different level of effort, knowledge and experience certainly can make a difference. Knowing the right people can certainly make a difference, too. There are lots of factors that go into being successful, not the least of which is luck, but effort, knowledge and experience are not the only factors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2021, 12:21 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,874,717 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by erasure View Post
Can you point exactly please where and how?
3/5 Compromise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2021, 12:22 PM
 
20,459 posts, read 12,379,585 times
Reputation: 10253
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
A different level of effort, knowledge and experience certainly can make a difference. Knowing the right people can certainly make a difference, too. There are lots of factors that go into being successful, not the least of which is luck, but effort, knowledge and experience are not the only factors.
knowing people and luck should not be discounting factors.
one shouldn't be punished because of perceived "luck".


i find that word is used by the left to discount the success of the "wrong" people.




i would also point out that none of us think inequality in access is a good thing. it does however seem to be the case that the left has a focus on outcome that is just flat wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top