Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obama made no attempt to strengthen NATO, which pleased Putin
Was NATO in need of strengthening? It certainly didn't need weakening, as Trump continually tried to do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer
Why didn't Putin get Trump a 2nd term if he was so enamored with Trump?
You don't think he tried? He certainly helped Trump win in 2016. The Mueller report is quite telling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer
Consider too the Russian collusion story was an attempt by hillary and obama at insurection and election rigging, which we have seen they are so good at.
That's one fantasy too far, pal.
But tell me this: Why did Trump disallow ANYONE to attend his one-on-one meeting with Putin? And did he confiscate the interpreter's notes? Isn't it time to subpoena that interpreter to see what was discussed at that private meeting?
Was NATO in need of strengthening? It certainly didn't need weakening, as Trump continually tried to do.
You don't think he tried? He certainly helped Trump win in 2016. The Mueller report is quite telling.
If that's how you read it, it is indeed "telling" . . . lies. The hacking was never proven, and as time goes by (with no proof) it becomes more and more obvious that Russia didn't hack the DNC. Presumably, it *was* Seth Rich who leaked the emails to Wikileaks, or why else would the FBI have been sitting on his laptop for four years?
Trump didn't hurt the country and a lot of the things he fixed are being undone by Biden already via EO's.
It seems to me if Russia "groomed" Trump they must have wanted what's best for the USA...but we all know this OP is just junky controversy posted only to get comments.
Can't blame him, there's enough stupid people in the country to make him a rich man. They'll buy the book just to take a picture of it on their bookshelf along with White Fragility and the Antifa Handbook.
So I'm suppose to believe that the Russians invested in a non politician 40 years ago because they knew he was going to become the president on day? That is some crystal ball magic right there.
Most of the instances of the US being tougher on Russia came from either congress or the Trump administration of which Trump was personally opposed to those sanctions.
The link admitted his policies were not softer than Obama and then tried to credit it to other agencies. His rhetoric is usually different from his deeds. Because of the relentless attack on him for being soft on Russia, he'll easily go in for more hostile positions.
I don't think it makes much difference who's president on military with regard to foreign interventions.
The policies and the strategies were already in place.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
