42 Senate Democrats vote in favor of government payments to illegal immigrants (illegals, dollars)

[gailjnh]

And here they are: https://www.senate.gov/legislative/L...n=1&vote=00018

[scot892]

Not surprising and interesting at the same time. It confirms who our traitors are. Also interesting, is the states that were in question this past election are the states that favored Illegals getting help. Maybe the Illegals somehow voted in states like Georgia, New Mexico and Nevada. Might have a correlation there. What's surprising is that not ALL Ds are traitors.

[fishbrains]

Lets be a little more balanced on this one.

Republicans introduced a non-binding amendment that would prevent illegal immigrants from receiving stimulus payments. However, illegal immigrants have never been eligible for receiving these payments, and there is nothing in the current proposal that would expand stimulus payments to illegal immigrants.

So the Republicans took the time to propose a non-binding amendment to vote against something that nobody has proposed in any case.

I imagine most Democrats were voting against meaningless Republican amendments rather than signaling support for something that nobody has seriously contemplated.

[andywire]

Originally Posted by fishbrains

Lets be a little more balanced on this one.

Republicans introduced a non-binding amendment that would prevent illegal immigrants from receiving stimulus payments. However, illegal immigrants have never been eligible for receiving these payments, and there is nothing in the current proposal that would expand stimulus payments to illegal immigrants.

So the Republicans took the time to propose a non-binding amendment to vote against something that nobody has proposed in any case.

I imagine most Democrats were voting against meaningless Republican amendments rather than signaling support for something that nobody has seriously contemplated.

Someone who identifies as fishbrains is going to tell us what they imagine, in an attempt to defend the democrat's treasonous behavior. Sorry, but I will stay outraged, thank you.

[double6's]

I'll claim illegal immigrant on my tax return if it will give me more money..

[fishbrains]

Originally Posted by andywire

Someone who identifies as fishbrains is going to tell us what they imagine, in an attempt to defend the democrat's treasonous behavior. Sorry, but I will stay outraged, thank you.

You do you. You can stay outraged based upon something as meaningless as a screen name, or you can learn about the political process and the facts related to our country's budget.

Sounds like you don't actually care about the facts.

[Bureaucat]

Originally Posted by Oldglory

Don't hold your breath for a concession on this one. She's a hopeless, clueless liberal.

Cultists, of all people, calling others “clueless” have no sense of irony.

[andywire]

Originally Posted by fishbrains

You do you. You can stay outraged based upon something as meaningless as a screen name, or you can learn about the political process and the facts related to our country's budget.

Sounds like you don't actually care about the facts.

The facts are clear as day. When democrats get together, you are far more likely to see the American flag set on fire. You never see this happen when republicans get together, unless there is a leftist counter protest nearby. Hence, the democrats clearly harbor people with far greater ill will towards this nation and it's people (except illegals who they clearly love and prefer).

[fishbrains]

Originally Posted by andywire

The facts are clear as day. When democrats get together, you are far more likely to see the American flag set on fire. You never see this happen when republicans get together, unless there is a leftist counter protest nearby. Hence, the democrats clearly harbor people with far greater ill will towards this nation and it's people (except illegals who they clearly love and prefer).

So you have nothing relevant to say concerning stimulus payments or the Senate budget reconciliation process?

Instead you want to discuss something that you present without supporting documentation, and that is supported by the 1st Amendment right to free speech?

[Rom623]

Originally Posted by gailjnh

And here they are: https://www.senate.gov/legislative/L...n=1&vote=00018

THANKS for posting!