Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-08-2021, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oklazona Bound View Post
In the US death rates are trending down. Cases have been down for a month now. Deaths lag cases by several weeks due to how they are reported.
Was speaking about the UK.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oklazona Bound View Post
It does not mean the likely hood of an average person getting covid has actually gone down. It means high risk elderly and ill people are not contracting it because they have the vaccine. So the numbers look much better.
So even though in the UK, the January and early February deaths are much higher than in December that means the numbers look good?

 
Old 02-08-2021, 09:31 AM
 
30,160 posts, read 11,789,790 times
Reputation: 18684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Why has the death rate increased by a large number in the UK and Scotland since the vaccines came out

UK deaths rates
mid December between 400-600
First week of Feb 800-1450

taking out the weekend numbers since those are always low

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/uk/


You are cherry picking numbers. 932 is the 7 day moving average of deaths in the UK as of now. January 24rd was the peak with a 7 day moving average of 1240. Why try to mislead people?
 
Old 02-08-2021, 09:33 AM
 
8,146 posts, read 3,676,088 times
Reputation: 2718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
lol They are not trending down. They are lower than a few days ago but much higher than in December. I have repeated that over and over and over again. Odd that you refuse to address that fact.



yea, take a class on how to read and understand a graph.
Lol, yes, they are. You should definitely do that.

Yes, they are higher than December.

UK, positive cases:

Early December: about 15k per day (7 day average)
Mid December: about 20k per day
Early January: about 60k per day

Still not obvious? When you get highly contagious variant, you get many more infections. Deaths are proportional to cases. And there is a lag.
 
Old 02-08-2021, 09:33 AM
 
30,160 posts, read 11,789,790 times
Reputation: 18684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Was speaking about the UK.

So even though in the UK, the January and early February deaths are much higher than in December that means the numbers look good?

Deaths are down in the UK 25% from their peak January 24th. That is a fact. Why be misleading?
 
Old 02-08-2021, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oklazona Bound View Post
Deaths are down in the UK 25% from their peak January 24th. That is a fact. Why be misleading?
It is still much. much higher than in December, when the vaccine came out, which is my only point. Why be misleading?
 
Old 02-08-2021, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by serger View Post
Lol, yes, they are. You should definitely do that.

Yes, they are higher than December.

UK, positive cases:

Early December: about 15k per day (7 day average)
Mid December: about 20k per day
Early January: about 60k per day

Still not obvious? When you get highly contagious variant, you get many more infections. Deaths are proportional to cases. And there is a lag.
You mean the rapid covid testing? That they are testing a lot more which means more positive cases?

You didn't look deep into it enough.
 
Old 02-08-2021, 09:47 AM
 
8,226 posts, read 3,421,135 times
Reputation: 6094
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaysOfGrace2007 View Post
The problem isn’t the short term with the vaccine. It’s what it’s going to do to you. long term. If you’re healthy with a good immune system why risk it. Not one Longtitudinal study done. If you’re at risk ok it’s worth it most likely. If you’re not, don’t bother. The “cure” can be worse than The infection in a few years. Or at least a few years to when the studies are done
I agree. But there might never be studies on the long term side effects. If almost everyone gets the vaccine, there will be nothing to compare to. That is probably what the drug companies are counting on. More people getting autoimmune disorders? Well that's just because more people are living longer, thanks to our wonderful drugs.
 
Old 02-08-2021, 11:05 AM
 
3,647 posts, read 1,600,968 times
Reputation: 5086
CDC VAERS tracks vaccine adverse reactions. In the Grant Final Report several years ago it was found that vaccine reporting:

Quote:
Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.
https://www.nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NV...eport-2011.pdf
So I wanted to check VAERS for reported covid19 vaccine deaths. Using medalerts.org, which gathers data from VAERS and makes it easy to do searches. I found for the two covid-19 vaccines since Dec to today 2.8.21:


Deaths within 3 days:

Found 308 cases where Onset Interval is 0 or 1 or 2 or 3 and Vaccine targets COVID-19 (COVID19) and Patient Died and Vaccination Date from '2020-12-01' to '2021-02-28'

Deaths within 14 days:

Found 428 cases where Onset Interval is 0 or 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10 to 14 and Vaccine targets COVID-19 (COVID19) and Patient Died and Vaccination Date from '2020-12-01' to '2021-02-28'

1% reporting?

You can do a search here:

https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
 
Old 02-08-2021, 11:24 AM
 
8,146 posts, read 3,676,088 times
Reputation: 2718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
You mean the rapid covid testing? That they are testing a lot more which means more positive cases?

You didn't look deep into it enough.
There was an explosion of positive cases in late December - early January as was already explained to you. At present, the positive daily cases are almost back to the early December levels. Yes, the deaths are still higher, due to the mentioned lag, but clearly dropping. And since it looks like they might be completing vaccinations of the most vulnerable groups in a matter of weeks, the deaths should of course drop further.
 
Old 02-08-2021, 11:48 AM
 
3,092 posts, read 1,946,787 times
Reputation: 3030
https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/...e-the-Living:7

Video discussing the nano tech in the kill shot.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top