Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's actually not. Think very carefully about what it means, to have a handful of corporations with the ability to effectively silence a sitting U.S. President.
You should NOT be ok with that, regardless of who's in that chair.
I would say the same thing if it happened to Biden, or another Dem.
It's actually not. Think very carefully about what it means, to have a handful of corporations with the ability to effectively silence a sitting U.S. President.
You should NOT be ok with that, regardless of who's in that chair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaimuki
I would say the same thing if it happened to Biden, or another Dem.
I agree with both you guys. It is kind of scary how people can be silenced and who gets to decide it.
Meh. he doesn't need Twitter, I know it was his preferred method of communication but he's got a big enough following that whatever he says/states will get wide coverage no matter what.
If only there was some way a sitting president could launch some kind of conference where there were TV cameras and be beamed onto every channel available.
Are you saying he should have abused the emergency broadcast system, or are you referring to the networks which deliberately stopped showing his COVID press conferences when they realized his approval ratings were rising due to them? I could respond better if I knew which you were talking about.
More than half of Twitter's traffic was Trump tweets, people signed up to receive Trump tweets, people replying to Trump tweets, and people referencing Trump tweets.
Twitter lost more than half their traffic as a result of censoring Trump.
No problem, it will be back on the air when Trump gets another company to send messages on. Either an existing company, or one he sets up himself.
It's actually not. Think very carefully about what it means, to have a handful of corporations with the ability to effectively silence a sitting U.S. President.
You should NOT be ok with that, regardless of who's in that chair.
He's not a sitting US President and they banned his personal account, not the @POTUS account.
Stop clutching those pearls...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
