Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you support the establishment of a Third Patriot Political Party?
Yes 52 63.41%
No 22 26.83%
Undecided 8 9.76%
Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2021, 03:08 PM
 
Location: NY
16,028 posts, read 6,828,406 times
Reputation: 12279

Advertisements

Response: Opinion

Having heard from both sides of the fence it is clear that the
majority are in unison and in support of a party far removed from
the ones they belong to now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2021, 03:58 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,880,244 times
Reputation: 14125
No because most times when the US had the parties it caused chaos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2021, 04:09 PM
 
30,058 posts, read 18,652,475 times
Reputation: 20860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Retired View Post
Response: Opinion

Many years ago I have had enough of both
major parties and switched Conservative.

Upon hearing of a possible Third " Patriot " Party being
established I thought about the hazards of breaking
up the GOP and further empowering their Democratic rivals.


With 74 million disenfranchised but loyal Trump supporters there is a
strong possibility that it may in addition free many other voters who
may have not liked the man but appreciated his fulfillment of promises.
Compared to the mud slinging enjoyed by both Democrats and Republicans
a hop on board of this possibly newly founded political establishment is not
to be underestimated.

Chances of winning elections may be just ripe for the taking and not so far fetched.

I welcome a much needed breath of fresh air in this Country.

What say You?
If the democrats control the voting machines and can determine the outcome of any elections of consequence, what is the purpose of a political party or votes for that party?

As long as the fraud of the 2020 election is allowed to stand, we have no voting rights and thus no self determination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2021, 04:11 PM
 
15,580 posts, read 15,650,878 times
Reputation: 21960
NO party, ever, should be allowed to call themselves the patriot party.

However, from what I've heard, a third party might benefit America in the long run.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2021, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,880,244 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cida View Post
NO party, ever, should be allowed to call themselves the patriot party.

However, from what I've heard, a third party might benefit America in the long run.
Not really. In the long run, it is a realignment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2021, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,729,827 times
Reputation: 6593
If we can institute automatic runoffs in all elections, then third parties would be fine. For example imagine the following:
Democrat Candidate gets 40% of the vote.
Republican Candidate gets 38% of the vote.
Libertarian Candidate gets 20% of the vote.
Green Party Candidate gets 2% of the vote.

Typically, this would hand victory to the Democrat, but is that truly the will of the people here?? Automatic runoff means that if nobody got the majority, then you take the top two and redo the election with only them on the ballot. Realistically, that probably comes out something like this:
Democrat Candidate gets 47% (5% of the Libertarian vote and all of the Green Party)
Republican gets 53% of the vote (15% of the Libertarian vote.)

So with an automatic runoff, the will of the people is ensured, even if you have 20 parties pulling a significant portion of the vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2021, 07:23 PM
 
2,540 posts, read 1,032,641 times
Reputation: 2854
I think the Republican Party will have to revamp itself as more Libertarian and distance from Trump and they have a good chance of winning, esp if we go into recession and have crime issues all term. If Covid restrictions drag on for years, even moreso.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2021, 07:32 PM
 
Location: NY
16,028 posts, read 6,828,406 times
Reputation: 12279
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
If we can institute automatic runoffs in all elections, then third parties would be fine. For example imagine the following:
Democrat Candidate gets 40% of the vote.
Republican Candidate gets 38% of the vote.
Libertarian Candidate gets 20% of the vote.
Green Party Candidate gets 2% of the vote.

Typically, this would hand victory to the Democrat, but is that truly the will of the people here?? Automatic runoff means that if nobody got the majority, then you take the top two and redo the election with only them on the ballot. Realistically, that probably comes out something like this:
Democrat Candidate gets 47% (5% of the Libertarian vote and all of the Green Party)
Republican gets 53% of the vote (15% of the Libertarian vote.)

So with an automatic runoff, the will of the people is ensured, even if you have 20 parties pulling a significant portion of the vote.
Response: Opinion

Wonderful clarification. Well done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2021, 07:33 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,684 posts, read 18,773,845 times
Reputation: 22528
There already is a Libertarian Party and Constitution Party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2021, 09:58 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,880,244 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
If we can institute automatic runoffs in all elections, then third parties would be fine. For example imagine the following:
Democrat Candidate gets 40% of the vote.
Republican Candidate gets 38% of the vote.
Libertarian Candidate gets 20% of the vote.
Green Party Candidate gets 2% of the vote.

Typically, this would hand victory to the Democrat, but is that truly the will of the people here?? Automatic runoff means that if nobody got the majority, then you take the top two and redo the election with only them on the ballot. Realistically, that probably comes out something like this:
Democrat Candidate gets 47% (5% of the Libertarian vote and all of the Green Party)
Republican gets 53% of the vote (15% of the Libertarian vote.)

So with an automatic runoff, the will of the people is ensured, even if you have 20 parties pulling a significant portion of the vote.
Automatic run-offs would have to be constitutional to institute nationally. The problem is the majority is whichever candidate has the most votes except when you talk the 50% like Georgia has or the Jungle primary Louisiana has.

For example let's take Arizona. In 2016, Trump won Arizona 48.08% of the popular vote to Hillary Clinton's 44.58%. Libertarian candidate Johnson got 3.5% of the popular vote, Green candidate Stein got 1.22% and Evan McMullin got 0.67% of the popular vote as an independent. Under the traditional election Trump had a majority by 3.5% despite not having 50%. Compare that to 2020 where Biden and Trump both grew to 49.36% for Biden and 49.06% for Trump. Jo Jorgensen of the Libertarian Party shrunk the Johnson 4.08% to 1.52% of the popular vote. Plain and simple, Jorgensen was a horrible Libertarian candidate in a year that arguably the Libertarian Party should have grown its footprint considering its rise in vote totals from 2004...

Now would you want Trump to win in 2016 because he had a 3.5% differential but not a 50.00001% total vote? I know it is easy to say that for the 0.3% of the vote Biden won by, but Trump still didn't win Arizona with more than 50% of the vote...

I think the system as works. That said I think the bigger issues for third party is campaign financing (including 501(c)s) and the 270 to win threshold. If we went to a popular vote only, maybe just maybe a libertarian or green candidate focuses on metro areas and appeal to those voters enough. I know, not popular, but the existing method of swing states really is the other side of the same coin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top