Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2021, 11:25 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,519,803 times
Reputation: 10096

Advertisements

The State of Mississippi has passed a bill banning "transgender" student athletes (i.e., confused males) from female sports teams.

Quote:
Mississippi passes bill banning transgender student-athletes from female sports teams

Mississippi legislators have passed a bill that would ban transgender athletes from competing on female sports teams in schools and universities -- one of over two dozen similar measures proposed by state lawmakers nationwide this year.

The state House voted 81-28 Wednesday to pass the so-called Mississippi Fairness Act. It passed the state Senate last month, 34-9. The bill now heads to Gov. Tate Reeves for approval.
It appears from the article that "over two dozen similar measures proposed by state lawmakers nationwide this year." The sad thing about that is that it is not 49 similar measures in all of the other states, and that there is not a bill pending in the Democrat controlled congress for the same purpose.

They better pass a bill like this in Texas, including a clear definition of how to distinguish males from females.

Let's be clear: If you have a Y chromosome, you are a male. If you only have X chromosomes, you are a female. This is a very straightforward standard that is easy to determine and apply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2021, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Arizona
6,103 posts, read 2,725,398 times
Reputation: 5883
I kind of agree with this. Any guy can put on a dress and say he's a woman just to visit the ladies locker room.

Same with the whole bathroom thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2021, 11:45 AM
 
46,955 posts, read 25,990,037 times
Reputation: 29443
Small government, yes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2021, 11:51 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,519,803 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Small government, yes?
Our government will be smaller with two, easily verifiable sexes, than with 56 optional genders (or whatever the latest count is), with the federal government running around inserting itself in all of that. So yes, smaller government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2021, 12:02 PM
 
46,955 posts, read 25,990,037 times
Reputation: 29443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Our government will be smaller with two, easily verifiable sexes, than with 56 optional genders (or whatever the latest count is), with the federal government running around inserting itself in all of that. So yes, smaller government.
So lemme see if I have this right: Federal government inserting itself bad, state government regulating college sports good?

Hope you warmed up before attempting that stretch.

Just admit it, it won't hurt: You don't want small government, you want government enforcing your point of view. Because that will feel small, to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2021, 12:18 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,519,803 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
So lemme see if I have this right: Federal government inserting itself bad, state government regulating college sports good?

Hope you warmed up before attempting that stretch.

Just admit it, it won't hurt: You don't want small government, you want government enforcing your point of view. Because that will feel small, to you.
You seem to be confusing the generally right leaning notion of smaller, more 'conservative' government (which conserves the rights and liberties of the people, for the people and to the people) with libertarianism, which is basically anti-government.

Our constitution assigns the responsibility for governing the vast majority of issues to the states. Not to the federal government, to the states. Obviously, it has never occurred to anyone who is not insane to try to redefine the basic idea of male vs female in a way that creates tremendous confusion, animosity and strife, not to mention that is fundamentally unscientific and wrong, until now. With a broad conspiratorial effort now underway to do just that, not only in our country but around the world, it is time for the states to take some corrective action.

It is sad that this is necessary, as it certainly should not be. But there is a broad coalition of apparent lunatics that are working in concert to destroy our country and to fundamentally debase the very most basic aspects of our civilization.

This is a good law and every state should pass something like it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2021, 12:19 PM
 
4,384 posts, read 4,236,654 times
Reputation: 5864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
The State of Mississippi has passed a bill banning "transgender" student athletes (i.e., confused males) from female sports teams.



It appears from the article that "over two dozen similar measures proposed by state lawmakers nationwide this year." The sad thing about that is that it is not 49 similar measures in all of the other states, and that there is not a bill pending in the Democrat controlled congress for the same purpose.

They better pass a bill like this in Texas, including a clear definition of how to distinguish males from females.

Let's be clear: If you have a Y chromosome, you are a male. If you only have X chromosomes, you are a female. This is a very straightforward standard that is easy to determine and apply.
Explain this abstract then:

Disorders of sex chromosomes

Quote:
Disorders of sex chromosome, X and Y, consist of abnormality of the number or structure of the sex chromosome. Because sex chromosomes have a variety of genes related to sexual differentiation, disorders of sex chromosome induce a variety of disorders of sexual differentiation. At first, in this title, the process of normal sexual differentiation is shown. Classical disorders of sex chromosome are Klinefelter syndrome, XX male, XYY male, Turner syndrome, XXX female, and XY female. True hermphroiditism, mixed gonadal dysgenesis, and pure gonadal dysgenesis are also included, because most of these disorders have abnormal sex chromosome. Molecular analysis of sex chromosome is clarifying disorders with a minute abnormality of sex chromosome. They include male infertility, premature ovarian failure, and fragile X syndrome. Explanations of the above disorders are given briefly.
These syndromes are rare, but given the number of births in Mississippi last year, there would be 1 XY female born. Would you ban her from the girls' sports teams from her schools?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2021, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,495 posts, read 17,232,699 times
Reputation: 35785
I think this is a positive move for female empowerment, the development of their personalities and not to mention the chance for their skill in their chosen sport to earn them a scholarship.



Of course the elected that did this will no doubt be called Neanderthals by Biden and the Left who seem content to kneel on the necks of young women everywhere and squash their dreams.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2021, 12:28 PM
 
Location: King County, WA
15,837 posts, read 6,543,563 times
Reputation: 13333
I'm okay with that. It's unfortunate for the TG folks who still want to compete, but it's fair for the female athletes who want to compete on a level playing field.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2021, 12:32 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,519,803 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjshae View Post
I'm okay with that. It's unfortunate for the TG folks who still want to compete, but it's fair for the female athletes who want to compete on a level playing field.
And the "transgender" students in this case can still compete - as males, which is what their DNA says that they are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top