Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-09-2021, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Richmond, VA
5,047 posts, read 6,348,063 times
Reputation: 7204

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaMaj7 View Post
Election laws and procedures are up to the States!!!
Interesting. Texas sure didn’t seem to think so, when it tried to challenge results in other states. So did a lot of conservatives who were all for the lawsuit.

Situational ethics, I suppose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-09-2021, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
6,933 posts, read 2,390,775 times
Reputation: 5004
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgiaTransplant View Post
Interesting. Texas sure didn’t seem to think so, when it tried to challenge results in other states. So did a lot of conservatives who were all for the lawsuit.

Situational ethics, I suppose.
When if even ONE State decides to CHEAT in a national election, I believe that the other States have STANDING to sue!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2021, 06:06 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13711
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgiaTransplant View Post
Interesting. Texas sure didn’t seem to think so, when it tried to challenge results in other states. So did a lot of conservatives who were all for the lawsuit.

Situational ethics, I suppose.
The other states in question failed to change their election laws via the State Legislature, as required by the US Constitution. Instead, members of the Executive and or Judicial branches in those states unilaterally made those changes, which is unconstitutional.

In addition, the PA Legislature passed a law (ACT 77) that directly violates PA's state constitution. What they needed to do instead of passing an unconstitutional law was to amend their state constitution. They failed to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2021, 06:08 AM
 
19,387 posts, read 6,503,704 times
Reputation: 12310
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Given their recent behavior, SCOTUS will likely claim no one has standing. /smh
It’s very odd. Same way it was odd the way Roberts twisted himself into a pretzel to make Obamacare constitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2021, 06:10 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13711
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Given their recent behavior, SCOTUS will likely claim no one has standing. /smh
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
It’s very odd. Same way it was odd the way Roberts twisted himself into a pretzel to make Obamacare constitutional.
Exactly. SCOTUS is MIA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2021, 06:12 AM
 
19,387 posts, read 6,503,704 times
Reputation: 12310
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Exactly. SCOTUS is MIA.
The question is....WHY?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2021, 06:14 AM
 
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
6,933 posts, read 2,390,775 times
Reputation: 5004
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Exactly. SCOTUS is MIA.
For whatever reason the SCOTUS abdicated their RESPONSIBILITY to hear ANY case brought to them on this past election travesty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2021, 06:16 AM
 
3,225 posts, read 1,605,586 times
Reputation: 2888
Some points from the article...

1. Gives the federal government authority to administer elections: Although the U.S. Constitution gives states the authority to run their elections as they see fit, Democrats have interpreted the Constitution in their favor, stating in H.R. 1 that “Congress finds that it has broad authority to regulate the time, place, and manner of congressional elections under the Elections Clause of the Constitution, Article I, section 4.”

2. Limits a plaintiff’s access to federal courts when challenging H.R. 1: The bill mandates that any lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of H.R. 1 could only be filed in the District Court for the District of Columbia and all plaintiffs would be required “to file joint papers or to be represented by a single attorney at oral argument.”

3. Mandates automatic voter registration (AVR) in all 50 states (19 states currently have AVR): In what proponents call “modernizing” elections, any person who gives their information to designated government agencies, such as the Department of Motor Vehicles, a public university, or a social service agency, would be registered to vote. The bill mandates same-day and online registration.

4. Mandates no-fault absentee ballots: This provision does away with witness signature or notarization requirements for absentee ballots. Additionally, it would force states to accept absentee ballots received up to 10 days after Election Day.

5. Prevents election officials from removing ineligible voters from registries or confirming the eligibility and qualifications of voters: The bill would make it illegal to verify the address of registered voters, cross-checking voter registration lists to find individuals registered in multiple states, or ever removing registrants, no matter how much time has elapsed.

6. Restores the Voting Rights Act: This provision requires states to obtain approval from the federal government before implementing any changes to voting rules. There is also a provision that criminalizes the “hindering, interfering, or preventing” of anyone from registering or voting.

7. Bans state voter ID laws: States would no longer be allowed to require ID for voting and would be forced to accept signed statements from individuals claiming to verify who they say they are.

8. Ensures illegal immigrants can vote: The bill shields non-citizens from prosecution if they are registered to vote automatically. Agencies wouldn’t be required to keep records of those who decline to affirm their citizenship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2021, 06:17 AM
 
3,225 posts, read 1,605,586 times
Reputation: 2888
Continued...

9. Allows same-day voter registration: States would be required to permit same-day registration, including for early voting, at polling stations. The section includes a clause that requires same-day voter registration to be implemented in time for the upcoming elections in 2022.

10. Allows 16-year-olds to register to vote: From Jan. 1, 2022, states wouldn’t be allowed to refuse a voting application from anyone aged 16 or older. Additionally, states would be required “to carry out a plan to increase the involvement of individuals under 18 years of age in public election activities.”

11. Prohibits the publication of “misleading information” about elections: The bill makes it a federal crime to “communicate or cause to be communicated” information that is knowingly false and designed to discourage voting, carrying a sentence of up to five years. Opponents say the provision raises First Amendment concerns.

12. Allows felons to vote: Under the Democracy Restoration Act, federal dollars for prisons would be restricted in states that don’t allow ex-convicts to vote. The bill says that all felons can vote unless they are “serving a felony sentence in a correctional institution or facility at the time of the election.”

13. Mandates early voting: States would be required to allow anyone to cast a ballot during an early voting period prior to the date of the election.

14. Legalizes nationwide mail-in voting, without photo ID: Absentee voting by mail would be allowed in all federal elections and “may not require an individual to provide any form of identification as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot.” A witness signature wouldn’t be required.

15. Promotes ballot harvesting: Any designated person would be allowed to return absentee ballots to any ballot drop-off location or election office, so long as the person doesn’t receive compensation based on the number of ballots he or she collected. Additionally, there would be no limit on the number of absentee ballots any designated person could return.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2021, 06:18 AM
 
3,225 posts, read 1,605,586 times
Reputation: 2888
16. Requires states to accept ballots 10 days after Election Day: States would be required to accept any mailed ballots postmarked before or on Election Day that arrive within 10 days of the election. The bill allows states to expand that deadline.

17. Prohibits state election officials from campaigning in federal elections: State election officials would be from participating in political management or campaigns for any election in which the officials have supervisory authority. This would most affect states like Georgia, whose secretaries of state have been notably involved in elections.

18. Requires colleges and universities to hire “campus vote coordinators”: The bill requires institutions of higher learning to employ an official who would be responsible for informing students about elections and encouraging them to register to vote. It would incentivize voter registration by giving grants to institutions that have a high registration rate.

19. Mandates that states make absentee voter boxes available for 45 days within an election: Drop boxes would be made available for individuals to drop off absentee ballots for federal elections at any time, 24 hours a day, during the voting period.

20. Requires states to allow curbside voting: States may not “prohibit any jurisdiction administering an election for Federal office in the State from utilizing curbside voting as a method by which individuals may cast ballots in the election.”

21. Urges statehood for the District of Columbia and representation for territories: The bill points to the fact that the District of Columbia is not yet a state, adding, “The United States is the only democratic country that denies both voting representation in the national legislature and local self-government to the residents of its Nation’s capital.” It appoints a commission that would advocate for congressional representation and presidential votes.

22. Requires states to redraw congressional districts through “independent” commissions: Taking power away from state legislatures, the bill would require redistricting to occur through commissions that are also required to show “racial, ethnic, economic, and gender” diversity.

23. Creates a national commission to “protect United States democratic institutions”: A national commission would study elections and produce a report after 18 months with recommendations for improving elections. It would comprise 10 members, only four of whom would be selected by the minority party, giving control to the majority party (at this time, Democrats).

24. Mandates new disclosure for corporations: The bill codifies the Democrats’ DISCLOSE Act, to restrict corporate participation in elections. Democrats say this provision will shed light on dark money, while Republicans counter that the legislation’s transparency requirements would violate free speech rights.

25. Oversight of online political advertising: A provision called the Stand By Every Ad Act would stop campaign dollars from covering any form of advertising over the internet. Opponents say this would increase the cost of campaigning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top