Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They had severe reactions among some patients in the trials for the mRNA vaccines. They changed the formulation and excluded or limited the use of volunteers who were very young (< 16), very old, or had immune system dysfunction.
The autopsy would most likely identify the cause of kidney failure, though.
. The chief medical examiner in Utah disagrees with you that autopsy would be able to pick up if a vaccine was involved unless it was due to anaphylaxis.
. The chief medical examiner in Utah disagrees with you that autopsy would be able to pick up if a vaccine was involved unless it was due to anaphylaxis.
The autopsy could provide evidence for another cause, whether you want to understand it or not.
Maybe you should reconsider calling people “anti-vaxxers when discussing an issue (vaccines were not even mentioned until you threw that slur out there) which is a derogatory term by the way, if you feel it is a desperate move and if you dislike being labelled.
You're an anti-vaxxer, right? I mean, I could be wrong but from my encounters with you I'd say you have a consistent pattern of claiming vaccines are dangerous, unnecessary, etc. which is exactly what an anti-vaxxer is. I'm puzzled at to why you're trying to hide from this label, it's short for anti-vaccine which I'm sure we can all agree describes you pretty well.
Calling Suzy a shill is different because you have no evidence she has any relationship or beneficial interest with pharma/whatever, you're just throwing it out there as a catch-all for someone who doesn't agree with your anti-science viewpoints.
You're an anti-vaxxer, right? I mean, I could be wrong but from my encounters with you I'd say you have a consistent pattern of claiming vaccines are dangerous, unnecessary, etc. which is exactly what an anti-vaxxer is. I'm puzzled at to why you're trying to hide from this label, it's short for anti-vaccine which I'm sure we can all agree describes you pretty well.
Calling Suzy a shill is different because you have no evidence she has any relationship or beneficial interest with pharma/whatever, you're just throwing it out there as a catch-all for someone who doesn't agree with your anti-science viewpoints.
Do you see the difference?
Anti-vaxxer is a derogatory term. Don’t call people derogatory terms, if you don’t want them thrown back at you. I am not “against all vaccines”. I’m for choice. That is all. I am also not “anti science”. There is no need to be a bully just because you have a different point of view.
You can find more results on duck duck go than Google but not much. Autopsy cannot attribute deaths to the vaccine unless the cause is anaphylaxis. There is no way to know if the vaccine led to one’s death. How convenient.
Yes and they will always say this!! (Keeps them from bieng sued,etc...)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
