Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-12-2021, 02:58 PM
 
8,232 posts, read 3,492,716 times
Reputation: 5681

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by YourWakeUpCall View Post
Logic is where I come up with this stuff. Try to keep up.


1) You, a private seller, wishes to sell one of your guns
2) You find a buyer. It's someone you don't know.
3) Said buyer is a convicted serial killer and has been recently paroled.
4) Without a background check, you have no way of knowing #3.
5) As a result of Biden's law, a background check reveals the buyer can't legally buy a gun.
6) Thanks to the new law you, the seller, now know the potentially buyer can't legally own a gun.
7) You don't sell him the gun. Victory!!



He's trying to buy the gun illegally. A background check will prevent him from doing so in this particular set of circumstances. Again - this is really easy, obvious stuff. Try harder. Much harder. Before implying someone is stupid, check the mirror. Ironically, your post literally proved my point.
Serial killer would just kill you and take all of the guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-12-2021, 03:00 PM
 
8,232 posts, read 3,492,716 times
Reputation: 5681
Quote:
Originally Posted by YourWakeUpCall View Post
Try harder. People who have murdered multiple people do, in fact, sometimes end up back on the streets. Do your research. More importantly, you're deflecting. The point is that background checks will reveal people who legally can't own guns. A serial killer was just an example.
I have a master's degree in criminal justice. I have already done a lot of research.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2021, 03:03 PM
 
321 posts, read 128,870 times
Reputation: 290
1/6/2021. Is why we need background checks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2021, 03:05 PM
 
8,232 posts, read 3,492,716 times
Reputation: 5681
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandee38 View Post
1/6/2021. Is why we need background checks
Huh? How so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2021, 03:07 PM
 
8,758 posts, read 5,055,756 times
Reputation: 21328
All the thugs, that want a gun are going to get one one the street, and kill those of us, who are being held back by biden, so we can`t get one for protection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2021, 03:17 PM
 
9,507 posts, read 4,342,349 times
Reputation: 10557
Quote:
Originally Posted by yspobo View Post
I have a master's degree in criminal justice. I have already done a lot of research.
No you haven't, or you'd know that there are, in fact, convicted serial killers who are currently no longer in custody. That's fact. You can continue to deny the facts, but you're just making yourself look bad. Anyone can dig up this info, so citing your useless degree just makes you look worse. Frankly, I'm astounded that you made it through college without knowing how to search the internet. Criminal Justice is a fluff degree, but I would have expected even CJ majors to have to do a little research.

It literally took me 2 seconds to find this:

https://www.ranker.com/list/serial-k...e/ranker-crime

You. Are. Wrong.

Period. End of story. Done. Finito. Game over. Lights out. Why you would choose to stand your ground on an easily dis-proven position is beyond me, but here we are.

I'm not sure what's going on in this thread. Like I've said already - I'm pro-gun and a lifetime NRA member. However, the level of cognitive dissonance among some of the pro-gun folks in this thread rivals that of the wokest lefties. Even when confronted with well documented facts and unassailable logic, you guys are doubling down on the dumbness. I admire you passion for the protection of gun rights, but not being able engage in rational discourse on the topic isn't helping our case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2021, 03:45 PM
 
5,985 posts, read 2,917,886 times
Reputation: 9026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
The 2nd as written recognizes an existing right (gun ownership of the individual) and is an acknowledgment that the fed govt has no authority to infringe on that right. There are no exceptions.
So you're right, we dont have to play the slipperly slope game, which really isnt that slippery, because it is a certainty that if given an inch, the state will keep taking. For further proof see this discussion and thousands of others about gun rights and laws, which if the constitution were indeed followed, wouldn't even be taking place.

By its own rulebook the fed govt has no role in gun ownership, period. That means no NICS,mental health, training or gun safety requirements. Your wishes and opinions are irrelevant to the matter.
I addressed this already. Read what I already wrote in this thread. In a perfect world, no one would be allowed to own a gun without background checks and safety training. I understand the legal challenges behind what I am saying. That doesn't make me less correct. There is absolutely no problem with removing the right to bear arms from people who prove to be mentally unstable, or mentally immature enough to pass a simple safety test. I understand your interpretation of the constitution differs from mine on this topic. We can agree to disagree.

Last edited by Lekrii; 03-12-2021 at 03:55 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2021, 04:12 PM
 
46,281 posts, read 27,099,738 times
Reputation: 11126
Why would any known killer go to a person who has to take them and get a background check?

That's the entire point folks....those that are already on the "cannot buy any firearm" will not go through legal channels.. Why is this so hard to understand?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2021, 04:27 PM
 
29,483 posts, read 14,650,004 times
Reputation: 14448
Quote:
Originally Posted by YourWakeUpCall View Post
Holy crap. That is precisely the point. Right now, a convicted felon can buy a gun from a private seller because the seller won't know he's a felon. Under Biden's law, the seller would know and wouldn't sell him the gun. The buyer, knowing his background will be checked WON'T EVEN TRY TO BUY THE GUN (those are your words, sport). Even if he did, THE SELLER WOULDN'T SELL IT TO HIM.


Bottom line:
THE FELON WON'T BUY THE GUN. Which is precisely, exactly, the point of the law. You literally proved my point while still claiming I don't get it. Jeebus. I'm being perfect logical. Articulate why I'm not. I've completely eviscerated your "logic", but all you do is hurl insults.
Lol...that is some seriously flawed logic. This has already been brought up. Why would a convicted felon, that is well aware that just having a firearm in his posession, try and purchase one legally ? If this worked, Detroit would have zero shootings. See, handguns have to be registered with the MSP, yet we have shootings on a nightly basis. Kind of blows your logic out of the water. What you fail to grasp, is criminals don't follow laws, period. And they will find ways to get a firearm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2021, 04:29 PM
 
29,483 posts, read 14,650,004 times
Reputation: 14448
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Why would any known killer go to a person who has to take them and get a background check?

That's the entire point folks....those that are already on the "cannot buy any firearm" will not go through legal channels.. Why is this so hard to understand?
Yeah, we can see that many of these individuals simply have zero clue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top