Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Was criminals raiding each other. No one was confronting a women in the belly and no one was pregnant.
Simply the right enhancing the story on Floyd.
No way was Floyd a nice guy. But he still has his basic rights.
The evidence presented against Chauvin is too overwhelming. So they distract with character assassination. We see through them, and it’s easy to redirect them.
Why does the right lie? The gun to the pregnant woman's belly has bee repeatedly debunked. Never happened. But the Right continues to retell it...
debunked by who? and why you say it comes from the right? Floyd had been sentenced to five years in prison in 2009 for aggravated assault stemming from a robbery where Floyd entered a woman’s home, pointed a gun at her stomach and searched the home for drugs and money, according to court records.
You’re welcome. The part where the jurors kept touching their own necks as Dr Tobin explained the physiology of neck compression, even after the judge told them they didn’t have to, showed how engaged the jurors were with the pulmonologist’s testimony. I just think the prosecution presented a very compelling case backed by expert testimony, law enforcement, and visuals. They really got the jury in the right frame of mind to reject the three main arguments from the defense: drug overdose, appropriate but ugly restraint, and a threatening crowd. The defense is looking extremely unreasonable at this point.
You’re welcome. The part where the jurors kept touching their own necks as Dr Tobin explained the physiology of neck compression, even after the judge told them they didn’t have to, showed how engaged the jurors were with the pulmonologist’s testimony. I just think the prosecution presented a very compelling case backed by expert testimony, law enforcement, and visuals. They really got the jury in the right frame of mind to reject the three main arguments from the defense: drug overdose, appropriate but ugly restraint, and a threatening crowd. The defense is looking extremely unreasonable at this point.
The defense hasn't started their case. You know nothing about a court case but you already made up your mind before any cross examination or the defense's case. The defense will bring it's own experts but I'm guessing you won't have an open mind, you already made up your mind.
How many sexual partners did he have before this incident?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What's your point?