Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should we cancel "ableism"
Yes - Make sure all people's abilities are alike 0 0%
Yes - Make sure there are no micro-aggressions against people without exceptional abilities 0 0%
Yes - Handicap the exceptional so all are equal 0 0%
No - Are you serious? 3 100.00%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-06-2021, 02:46 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,045 posts, read 16,995,362 times
Reputation: 30178

Advertisements

This article, Equality Matters, The harmful ableist language you unknowingly use (link), highlights the disgusting discrimination against the disabled.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC
(link), excerpt)
So, it always stings when I’m reminded that for many, the word ‘deaf’ has little to do with what I love most – in fact, its connotations are almost exclusively negative. For example, in headlines across the world – Nevada’s proposed gun safety laws, pleas from Ontario’s elderly and weather safety warnings in Queensland – have all “fallen on deaf ears”.
This kind of ‘ableist’ language is omnipresent in conversation: making a “dumb” choice, turning a “blind eye” to a problem, acting “crazy”, calling a boss “psychopathic”, having a “bipolar” day. And, for the most part, people who utter these phrases aren’t intending to hurt anyone – more commonly, they don’t have any idea they’re engaging in anything hurtful at all.
It is as if we are putting our knee on the neck of the disabled. Kurt Vonnegut in Harrison Bergeron (not sure whether short story names are underlined) had the right idea, to equalize all people regardless of ability to avoid stigma and hate. In the story, people were "handicapped" so that they could not excel:
Quote:
Originally Posted by (written by author) Kurt Vonnegut
THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.
It is high time that we stop the hurtful micro-aggressions that are part of every day life. Or perhaps the better analogy is jump-the-shark. I don't know.

Last edited by jbgusa; 04-06-2021 at 02:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top