Biden budget proposal most reckless in recent history ! (Congress, legal, weapons)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You mean Biden is not that great a business politician?
"Wat ju takin bout Willis???"
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/biden...121301060.html
Tyler Goodspeed, former acting chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under former President Trump, told Yahoo Finance Live all that President Biden's sp...
Irresponsible Democrats try and dance around this!
"Iām an economic historian, and I think we are looking right now at the most reckless fiscal policy in the last half century,ā said Goodspeed, the Kleinheinz Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University."
Invest in hard assets. Inflation is Revenge for the idiot Democrats put in office
I think Biden wants to eliminate poverty and win climate change.
I read $40 billion for poor people, $29 billion for poor schools and $16 billion to end climate change.
He didn't cut defense spending though and there's a few Dems in Congress that want to see major cuts to defense.
Then again, it's a proposal and has to go through Congress.
But that's a heck of a lot of money we don't have.
May as well just go all out and finish incinerating the country with heavy debt, depression and inflation. A new America has to emerge. its inevitable now. Pay off all our mortgages while your at. Get it over with. You can't be "half pregnant"
Owners, dealers and manufacturers were required to destroy the devices or turn them into a local Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives office. Federal authorities estimated that half a million bump stocks had been sold in the United States.
Once attached to a rifle in place of the normal stock, or end piece, bump stocks allow rounds to be fired in quick succession, nearly as fast as an automatic weapon. The Trump administration concluded that they violated a federal law banning machine guns, defined as weapons that automatically fire more than one shot "with a single function of the trigger."
The underlying federal law did not change, but the ATF ā which for years had said bump stocks were legal ā reversed itself at Trump's direction. That prompted gun rights advocates to sue, but they lost at every stage in the lower courts.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, agreed with his colleagues that the court should not grant a review of the lawsuit, although he said the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., used the wrong logic in upholding the ban and suggested he would be open to hearing the issue at a future date.
I heard that joe bought a fiddle and headboard harris brought some matches, what do you suppose that means ?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.