Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-22-2021, 01:43 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,636,949 times
Reputation: 9676

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WK91 View Post
All you have to do is use common sense to understand that wearing a mask is not good for you aside from possibly protecting you from the virus.

Does that benefit outweigh the damage you are doing to yourself by rebreathing cloth over and over again?

I guess if you are 79 years old, obese, and have diabetes and respiratory problems, then the benefit of wearing a mask outweighs the damage.

But if you are a healthy younger person, I’m skeptical that a mask is in your best interest.

Which leads to my final point, which is it’s not my problem if your body can’t fight off the virus. Nor is it yours if my body can’t either. So wearing the mask to protect others is a bunch of BS.
So are you a medical doctor?

 
Old 04-22-2021, 02:38 AM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,233,267 times
Reputation: 9845
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
CDC WEBSITE Confirms Stanford Study on Face Masks Being Harmful – Cause Serious Side Effects

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202..._content=daily

Did you even read the CDC report? Obviously not because this at the very top of the report:

Quote:

The Physiological Burden of Prolonged PPE Use on Healthcare Workers during Long Shifts

Please note that this blog is specifically about respirators used by healthcare workers during long shifts and not facemasks worn as barrier control to stop the spread of COVID.
They are talking about RESPIRATORS!!!

And LONG SHIFT!!!

Holly cow, the fake news spread by the right-wing is getting even more ridiculous, something I didn't think possible.

.
 
Old 04-22-2021, 03:47 AM
 
Location: My house
7,363 posts, read 3,529,717 times
Reputation: 7750
God doesn't exist and did not design our bodies. Scientists with Bachelor's of Art degrees have the knowledge and expertise of the human respiratory system. Listen to the science. A mask is the only way from not getting the 100% fatal coronavirus
 
Old 04-22-2021, 03:47 AM
 
7,420 posts, read 2,709,679 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
CDC WEBSITE Confirms Stanford Study on Face Masks Being Harmful – Cause Serious Side Effects

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202..._content=daily
FALSE^^^

The study lacks evidence on masks and isn’t linked to Stanford.
Websites and social media users ranging from political candidates to health influencers and ignorant rabble rousers are falsely claiming a study published on a digital research repository came from Stanford University and proves face masks are ineffective.

In reality, the study is not affiliated with Stanford and is based on debunked claims about face masks, including the false notion that wearing a face covering decreases oxygen levels and increases carbon dioxide levels.

Here is a credible multi-sourced article and fact checking story from The Associated Press which explains and debunks yet another piece of propaganda masquerading as science. AP is involved in an ongoing effort to fact-check misinformation that is shared widely online, including work with Facebook to identify and reduce the circulation of false stories on the platform.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-629043235973

Quote:
This study is not affiliated with Stanford University, nor does the author work for the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System as he claims. The study presents a hypothesis that includes false claims about the health effects of wearing masks. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention continues to recommend wearing face coverings to reduce the spread of COVID-19, as research shows they can block the transmission of respiratory droplets, which spread the virus.
The study circulating online this week was first published in November in the journal “Medical Hypotheses,” which writes that its purpose is to “publish interesting theoretical papers.” Articles submitted to the journal are not meant to prove findings using primary data, but instead to advance hypotheses.

Quote:
The journal has a “long history of publishing fringe science and hypotheses,” according to David Gorski, a surgical oncologist who blogs about medical misinformation.

The study’s author, Baruch Vainshelboim, is listed in the study as being affiliated with the cardiology division at the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System/Stanford University.
However, a representative for the VA Palo Alto Health Care System told the AP in an email that Vainshelboim does not work there.
“I can confirm this person is not one of our physicians,” wrote Michael Hill-Jackson, a public affairs specialist with the system. “I do not see him in our system and our Cardiology team has never heard of him.”
Vainshelboim also does not work for Stanford, according to Julie Greicius, senior director of external communications for the university’s medical school.
“Stanford University has never employed Baruch Vainshelboim,” Greicius wrote in an email to the AP. “Several years ago (2015), he was a visiting scholar at Stanford for a year, on matters unrelated to this paper.”
Vainshelboim, who lists himself on LinkedIn as a clinical exercise physiologist appears to be unemployed.
___
 
Old 04-22-2021, 07:02 AM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,096 posts, read 18,269,535 times
Reputation: 34972
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
CDC WEBSITE Confirms Stanford Study on Face Masks Being Harmful – Cause Serious Side Effects




https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202..._content=daily
Yes the CDC confirms this about a specific mask. Do you even read your own links ?

From the CDC blog:

https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-...10/ppe-burden/
Please note that this blog is specifically about respirators used by healthcare workers during long shifts and not facemasks worn as barrier control to stop the spread of COVID.
 
Old 04-22-2021, 07:24 AM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,471,648 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by WK91 View Post
All you have to do is use common sense to understand that wearing a mask is not good for you aside from possibly protecting you from the virus.

Does that benefit outweigh the damage you are doing to yourself by rebreathing cloth over and over again?

I guess if you are 79 years old, obese, and have diabetes and respiratory problems, then the benefit of wearing a mask outweighs the damage.

But if you are a healthy younger person, I’m skeptical that a mask is in your best interest.

Which leads to my final point, which is it’s not my problem if your body can’t fight off the virus. Nor is it yours if my body can’t either. So wearing the mask to protect others is a bunch of BS.
There are about no risks with masks, unless you are already respiratory compromised. There is no damage to yourself from rebreathing cloth or paper masks.

I work out at the gym almost daily, and when wearing a mask during the Pandemic noticed little difference. Although no doubt it would have to restrict some very high level of aerobics. My O2 sat during my higher level of aerobic exercise on room air at about 600 ft elevation was 100%.
 
Old 04-22-2021, 07:40 AM
 
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
5,067 posts, read 1,666,549 times
Reputation: 3144
15 days to flatten the curve.
 
Old 04-22-2021, 08:14 AM
 
4,022 posts, read 1,877,686 times
Reputation: 8647
The curve did flatten - it didn't say 15 days to remove the virus from the planet. The point was to prevent a NYC / Lombardi type situation from happening in any other USA town - and mainly, it did not.



I'm sorry if you thought that meant it would be gone in 15 days - that was never on the table.
 
Old 04-22-2021, 08:33 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by notnamed View Post
Nope. Fake “study” that spells about as well as a Nigerian prince email and does not work where claimed. Covered in this thread.

https://www.city-data.com/forum/poli...new-study.html
Harvard Study:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-productivity/

Reducing oxygen levels cause cancer to take over.
https://thehayride.com/2021/02/is-ca...o-your-health/


CDC Published:
https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-...10/ppe-burden/

Getting called out:
https://thehayride.com/2021/03/rand-...verse-effects/
 
Old 04-22-2021, 08:37 AM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,059,632 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
So to you are doctors and nurses ignorant fools for wearing masks while on duty, including when they are working in covid wards?
I personally am not worried about the dangers of wearing a mask but there is a difference between a doctor or nurse wearing a mask in a Covid ward and an individual in a grocery store who is socially distancing.

Also medical personnel change the masks more frequently.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top