Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
it's always great to be nostalgic about certain technologies, but reality is we only get one planet. Regardless of if its a combustion engine, solar panels, etc., we need to take care of the Earth. If that means the traditional engine goes away, that's not a bad thing.
What's so wonderful about internal combustion? It's just a way to get from point A to B. If you look back on the history of our species nothing really stays the same forever. Tech advances. We can't keep belching out CO2 from exhausts forever.
Plus both fuel cells and batteries will likely at their maturity have more torque with less moving parts. Yeah the older folks will be nostalgic towards their youthful tech but such is life.
What Realistically Can Replace The Internal Combustion Engine. Will it be Battery or Hydrogen Fuel Cells.
My money is on Hydrogen Fuel Cells. Though it will be a very sad day to see the gas internal combustion engine disappear.
Why does this bother Republicans so much? The personal automobile replaced the horse and buggy and the 18-wheeler replaced many of the old freight trains. Airliners replaced the passenger train. In some other countries, high-speed rail is replacing the airliner and it may here eventually as well.
I understand that Republicans have a very heavy nostalgia for the 1950s but things don't stay the same forever. Society evolves and technology evolves.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.