Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-04-2021, 11:49 AM
 
21,910 posts, read 9,483,127 times
Reputation: 19443

Advertisements

How they cheated.


W.I.M.P.: Did Adjudication of These Votes Provide The Hologram’s Margin of Victory?
.

https://redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2021/...ictory-n373099

...I have previously summarized his analyses of WIMP votes in Pennsylvania here and in Wisconsin here. Blehar’s findings from his Pennsylvania analysis include the following:

The total number of WIMP votes in Pennsylvania declined by ~113,000 votes from 2016 to 2020. This is highly unlikely given the massive number of mail-in ballots cast in 2020 compared to previous elections.
Only 453 write-in votes were received by mail-in ballot out of 2.6 million mail-in ballots cast. This is an improbably low number given that Howie Hawkins, the Green Party write-in presidential candidate, received ~34,000 fewer votes by mail-in than down-ballot Green Party average. Note that a similar situation occurred with Jill Stein in 2016 in Pennsylvania, causing her to refer to the Keystone State’s election system as a “national disgrace.”
Jo Jorgenson, the Libertarian candidate for president, received ~20,000 votes fewer by mail-in than down-ballot Libertarian candidates. This is a highly unlikely circumstance and a historical anomaly that strongly suggests vote shifting took place.
Vote-switching analysis determined that ~64,000 absentee ballot votes were taken from Trump and switched to Biden through the adjudication process, while ~30,000 Trump Election Day and absentee votes were directly shifted to Biden.
Blehar believes the following happened:

Conclusion #1: The total adjudication manipulation resulted in Biden winning the state by ~80,500 votes, but in reality, President Trump actually won Pennsylvania by over 186,000 votes.
Conclusion #2: Biden’s margin of victory could have only been obtained through adjudication manipulation....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2021, 11:57 AM
 
30,058 posts, read 18,655,134 times
Reputation: 20862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
How they cheated.


W.I.M.P.: Did Adjudication of These Votes Provide The Hologram’s Margin of Victory?
.

https://redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2021/...ictory-n373099

...I have previously summarized his analyses of WIMP votes in Pennsylvania here and in Wisconsin here. Blehar’s findings from his Pennsylvania analysis include the following:

The total number of WIMP votes in Pennsylvania declined by ~113,000 votes from 2016 to 2020. This is highly unlikely given the massive number of mail-in ballots cast in 2020 compared to previous elections.
Only 453 write-in votes were received by mail-in ballot out of 2.6 million mail-in ballots cast. This is an improbably low number given that Howie Hawkins, the Green Party write-in presidential candidate, received ~34,000 fewer votes by mail-in than down-ballot Green Party average. Note that a similar situation occurred with Jill Stein in 2016 in Pennsylvania, causing her to refer to the Keystone State’s election system as a “national disgrace.”
Jo Jorgenson, the Libertarian candidate for president, received ~20,000 votes fewer by mail-in than down-ballot Libertarian candidates. This is a highly unlikely circumstance and a historical anomaly that strongly suggests vote shifting took place.
Vote-switching analysis determined that ~64,000 absentee ballot votes were taken from Trump and switched to Biden through the adjudication process, while ~30,000 Trump Election Day and absentee votes were directly shifted to Biden.
Blehar believes the following happened:

Conclusion #1: The total adjudication manipulation resulted in Biden winning the state by ~80,500 votes, but in reality, President Trump actually won Pennsylvania by over 186,000 votes.
Conclusion #2: Biden’s margin of victory could have only been obtained through adjudication manipulation....

The problem is that you are pointing out logic to those who are devoid of logic.

The number of statistical impossibilities in the Biden "win" would raise strong suspicions among those who have more than a few remaining neurons. Democrats, of course, see no problem with all the abnormalities, which clearly point to voter fraud.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2021, 12:14 PM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,003 posts, read 12,585,284 times
Reputation: 8921
1) You lost. Go home.
2) Run someone stronger in 2024. DeSantis on first look looks to have HUGE potential and seems to keep running on all cylinders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2021, 12:27 PM
 
21,910 posts, read 9,483,127 times
Reputation: 19443
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottomobeale View Post
1) You lost. Go home.
2) Run someone stronger in 2024. DeSantis on first look looks to have HUGE potential and seems to keep running on all cylinders.
Why don't you READ the article and comment on its contents?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2021, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,862 posts, read 9,518,220 times
Reputation: 15573
Watching the Trumpers make up their own "math" in an attempt to "prove" the election was stolen is the same as watching creationists declare it is mathematically impossible for evolution to occur.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2021, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,862 posts, read 9,518,220 times
Reputation: 15573
And reasoning like this is why it's so easy to claim these supposed mathematical "reasonings" as 100% pure garbage. From the OP's link:

"The total number of WIMP votes in Pennsylvania declined by ~113,000 votes from 2016 to 2020. This is highly unlikely given the massive number of mail-in ballots cast in 2020 compared to previous elections."

WIMP's, as the article says, are the sum of write-in and minor party ballots. The writer states that, for some reason, it is unlikely there should be a decline in WIMP ballots from 2016 to 2020 ... because of the increase in mail-in ballots! This is 100% pure garbage. It simply does not follow that write-in and 3rd party ballots should increase because of an increase in mail-in ballots. Some people vote for 3rd party candidates because those 3rd party candidates are attractive candidates compared to the two main party candidates. In 2016, there were a number of fairly well-known 3rd party candidates which appeared on the ballots of most states - notably Gary Johnson of the Libertarians and Jill Stein of the Green Party. Neither of those two were on the 2020 ballot and were replaced by lesser-known candidates.

In addition, the high degree of dislike and hatred toward Trump was all that was needed for many people, including some republicans, to vote for Biden against Trump instead of some 3rd party candidate against Trump. With such visceral feelings against Trump, and Biden being seen as an acceptable alternative, many more people compared to 2016 realized that voting 3rd party was a wasted vote if one wanted to get rid of Trump.

Last but not least, Hillary wasn't in the race and Biden was more likable (and liked) than her, so it was easy for many people who voted for 3rd party in 2016 to vote instead for Biden in 2020.

That is all that is needed to explain the decline in WIMP votes in 2020. It has absolutely nothing to do with the degree of mail-in votes. But because Trumpers want to believe there was fraud, they will overlook that obvious explanation and devise their own made-up "math" that can easily be seen through, except to brainwashed Trumpers.

Last edited by James Bond 007; 05-04-2021 at 01:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2021, 01:42 PM
 
20,457 posts, read 12,375,634 times
Reputation: 10250
I think the statistical evidence both demonstrates that we really dont know what happened but it also could very well point to third party voters not taking a chance, voting to get rid of Trump then down ballot casting votes for 3 party candidates.

anyone suggesting we know what happened is just fooling themselves. i don't believe anyone. I don't believe Trump and I don't believe those saying Trump is a liar who had no evidence.

I dont believe any of you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2021, 01:56 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,602,543 times
Reputation: 18521
1.7 million cast... 2.4 million counted

Anything is possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2021, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,862 posts, read 9,518,220 times
Reputation: 15573
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
1.7 million cast... 2.4 million counted

Anything is possible.
Unsurprisingly, there are still Trumpers believing that lie. Great example of how brainwashed they are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top