Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is fantastic. Reminds me of that time last year when the MSNBC reporter scolded a guy for not wearing a mask, and the citizen rebuked him by pointing out that the reporter's camera man wasn't wearing one either! He even did some solid citizen journalism with his I-Phone to prove as such.
What a bunch of LARPING tools. The only thing more pathetic is the "progressives" who so easily fell for this nonsense. (Particularly considering that study after study has shown masks, for the most part, don't even work.)
Reporters normally take off their masks when talking on camera these days; they are easier to understand and the CDC says when reporting outside it is safe to do so.
Reporters normally take off their masks when talking on camera these days; they are easier to understand and the CDC says when reporting outside it is safe to do so.
Tempest in a teapot.
Really? I would gander about 80% of them wear masks outdoors. Just like our "President", and it completely defies the science which is supposedly oh so important to Lefties.
It's all about virtue signaling, and fostering the cult.
It is what it is, but you better believe I relish each and every moment where they are called out for the buffoons that they are.
Yes, because virtue signaling with the sole intent to manipulate the mass populace and indoctrinate them into a cult of fear is just small beer to the likes of you.
I don't know if you noticed the riots, or the lock downs, or the millions in mass unemployment - but you have "mole hills" like this to thank.
Reporters normally take off their masks when talking on camera these days; they are easier to understand and the CDC says when reporting outside it is safe to do so.
Reporters normally take off their masks when talking on camera these days; they are easier to understand and the CDC says when reporting outside it is safe to do so.
Tempest in a teapot.
Are you saying the CDC says you can report outside and have certain protests outside, but you cannot walk, jog, bike, dine or have certain other protests outside without a mask?
How does the virus know what protests to infect and which ones to leave alone? How does the virus know who is a reporter and who is not?
Or it’s just called bring cautious.
My relative works at a test site. She’s already thinking about applying for a new job because they’re gonna start laying people off. Testing is going down on a weekly basis. She still says to be cautious but she’s optimistic about this being over soon.
Except there's nothing "cautious" about wearing a mask outside when your chances of getting the virus are infinitesimale in that capacity.
Besides, he wasn't wearing the mask the entire time, until he went on camera.
It was all for show.
Now I see that while you first dismissed the video, you were actually controlling for your own cognitive dissonance.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
