Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Misreresent? Democrats are the party of cancel culture. Democrats are the labeling party. To the Democrats everyone is a racist, white supremist, domestic terrorist, Qanon supporter, unless you agree with them.
I agree with you. The CCP social credit system could be used by leftist in America to punish those who oppose or violate the tenants of political correctness or profess beliefs that go against the leftist agenda. This kind of thing would be constant with what we have seen from far left activists.
You're saying the balance of nature is stupid. Talk about incredibly stupid!
Quote:
So keep around predators who actively damage the state in order to not have to sell a few more deer hunting tags?
They are not damaging the state.
I don't consider selling some more deer tags to be some sort of burden which I want to be relieved of with wolves.
Wolves are deer's natural predators - certainly in a place like Idaho. They should have "first licks" at the deer population, and if there are still too many deer afterwards, then we adjust the number of deer tags to reflect whatever the wolves did not get.
No, on the contrary, I think it would be great. I'd love to see them reintroduce wolves into Missouri. There are already some mountain lions making their way to the Ozarks from points west, which I think is a great development.
And living in fear of everything that has a 1 in 100,000,000 chance of hurting you and wanting to exterminate it is certainly on brand for our friends on the right.
It's not "living in fear", it's taking care of a nuance so it can't continue to harm society.
You might be foolish enough to actually think you want wolves in your area, but it wouldn't take too many pets being killed in your neighborhood before you'd change your mind.
It's clear you don't care about ranchers, so I won't even attempt to get you to care about their livelihood.
It's not "fear mongering" talking about what actually happens when the wild predator population gets too high.
Having wolves prey on herds of animals is a problem for everyone who raises animals....crying for the predators who are harming society seems to be popular these days.
If there are wolves who are preying on livestock, a reasonable plan to eliminate or relocate problem individuals or packs can be implemented. But it is hardly necessary to seek to eliminate 90% of the population of wolves to accomplish that.
You're saying the balance of nature is stupid. Talk about incredibly stupid!
No.... I'm talking about keeping that balance in a way that benefits everyone while you are upset that literal predators are getting picked on so they won't be able to prey on livestock and game animals.
Again, it is completely on brand, but it's truly hard to believe that people are that ridiculous
Crying on the behalf of criminals and literal predators.... lol
You tell normal people about ridiculous people like that and they'd think you were lying....and yet here we are.
We were talking about how the left seeks to erode the rights and liberties of the people and the response is "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE WOLVES?!?!?!"
SMH
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
