Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do you mean if Israel continues to fight and destroy the lives of its enemies whose stated purpose is to drive them into the sea? Yes, that would be intelligent ... as well as moral, brave and admirable. The evidence of their intelligence is demonstrated every single day that they are not destroyed by the barbarians surrounding them.
In other words, you are saying that people hate Israelites. Israelites also hate Palestinians and whoever you refer as enemies. But there are so many countries out there where Palestinians and Israelites consider as friends.
If Israelites and Palestinians have common friends, then what could be the root cause for Israelites and Palestinians to hate each other?
If what happened to Palestine happens in America you can expect our people to act no differently.
The British mandate forcibly stole land from Palestinians, and now the Israelis are taking more and more through their own legal system that is meant to destroy them. And America arms Israel to the teeth to destroy them.
Imagine if China invaded the USA, came to your hometown, repopulated it with Indians, gave Indians control of the legal system, armed them to the teeth, and had them control your every movement while humiliating you and stealing land.
And the moment you lift a finger you are bombed day and night.
You would understand the hate then. Palestinians are relatively civilized compared to what Americans would do.
In 1948, a Palestinian referred to being a Jew. There were no Palestinian Arabs, there were only Egyptian, Syrian and Lebanese Arabs living in the land of Israel. The “Palestinians” were only invented as a people in the 1960s. The Jews have had a continuous unbroken presence in their Israeli homeland for 3,000 years. So stop all this nonsense about anew taking Arab lands. And as for Jerusalem, the Arabs only held it for 19 of those 3,000 years (1948 -1967). Stop taking your history lessons from CNN and the Wall Street Journal.
Probably desperately trying to justify the existence of people that don’t deserve to exist I assume.
Do you really have to justify a whole race of people to prove these they deserve to exist? That’s not an exercise anybody should have to entertain. I get you don’t think they are valuable- but that doesn’t mean they should be wiped out from the face of the earth, pretty harsh. I would go that far with any group of people, how about canibal tribes- should they be wiped out? Or a coven of witches. Who gets to decide which group of people don’t deserve to exist?
I understand that hamas wants to wipe out Israel but that is not a reason to justify their extinction.
In 1948, a Palestinian referred to being a Jew. There were no Palestinian Arabs, there were only Egyptian, Syrian and Lebanese Arabs living in the land of Israel. The “Palestinians” were only invented as a people in the 1960s. The Jews have had a continuous unbroken presence in their Israeli homeland for 3,000 years. So stop all this nonsense about anew taking Arab lands. And as for Jerusalem, the Arabs only held it for 19 of those 3,000 years (1948 -1967). Stop taking your history lessons from CNN and the Wall Street Journal.
Anyone living in Palestine was a Palestinian, including Jews. They could have continued to live in the same place called Palestine, but Zionism wanted to grab a big part of it to recreate something that had not existed for a very long time before.
Who gets to decide which group of people don’t deserve to exist?
Well historically speaking it's been socialists/communists. National socialists, Soviet socialists, Maoists, Khmer Rouge, CCP etc etc. They've gotten to decide who doesn't deserve to exist.
Well historically speaking it's been socialists/communists. National socialists, Soviet socialists, Maoists, Khmer Rouge, CCP etc etc. They've gotten to decide who doesn't deserve to exist.
So the consensus of the group posting here is that the Palestinian people should be banished from the face of the earth because they want the destruction of Israel. And also they have no redeeming values and have not won an nobel or pulitizers or have made any significant contributions. They should all be killed because they will attack jews and Israel otherwise. Just trying to understand what the most popular outcome should be.
Do you really have to justify a whole race of people to prove these they deserve to exist? That’s not an exercise anybody should have to entertain. I get you don’t think they are valuable- but that doesn’t mean they should be wiped out from the face of the earth, pretty harsh. I would go that far with any group of people, how about canibal tribes- should they be wiped out? Or a coven of witches. Who gets to decide which group of people don’t deserve to exist?
I understand that hamas wants to wipe out Israel but that is not a reason to justify their extinction.
Hamas is the group that is saying an entire group of people - Jews in Israel - don’t deserve to exist. And they teach that to their children at a very young age.
On the flip side, Jews in Israel are not teaching its children that Palestinians don’t deserve to exist.
So the consensus of the group posting here is that the Palestinian people should be banished from the face of the earth because they want the destruction of Israel. They should all be killed because they will attack jews and Israel otherwise. Just trying to understand what the most popular outcome should be.
Nobody said that. The only people who want to banish a group of people from the earth are Hamas (and of course Iran).
You have it so twisted that it’s unbelievable the extent to which you are justifying Hamas.
So the consensus of the group posting here is that the Palestinian people should be banished from the face of the earth because they want the destruction of Israel. And also they have no redeeming values and have not won an novels or pulitizers or have made any significant contributions. They should all be killed because they will attack jews and Israel otherwise. Just trying to understand what the most popular outcome should be.
I don’t think that’s a mutual sentiment at all. I think most pro-Israel folks would be thrilled to simply see Palestine stop making war their priority, and tend to the needs of its people instead. Make something of themselves other than nuisances to Jews.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
