Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sholomar - that's because you are not a nut. The first question says the Vaccine does NOT prevent COVID - and we know that is false bunk spread by nutcakes - and so the rest of the questions are to be approached with caution.
Sholomar - that's because you are not a nut. The first question says the Vaccine does NOT prevent COVID - and we know that is false bunk spread by nutcakes - and so the rest of the questions are to be approached with caution.
It doesn't prevent covid. That's why they were telling people to wear their mask. It reduces symptoms. The high number of breakthrough cases among vaccinated are why the cdc no longer is counting those cases unless the person is hospitalized with covid. Completely different way of counting than before vaccine. They need to find a way to show it has a benefit. If they don't test or count asymptomatic or mild cases, then the # of covid cases of vaccinated people, goes down on record Read the reasoning for answers at the end of the quiz.
It doesn't prevent covid. That's why they were telling people to wear their mask. It reduces symptoms. The high number of breakthrough cases among vaccinated are why the cdc no longer is counting those cases unless the person is hospitalized with covid. Completely different way of counting than before vaccine. They need to find a way to show it has a benefit. If they don't test or count asymptomatic or mild cases, then the # of covid cases of vaccinated people, goes down on record Read the reasoning for answers at the end of the quiz.
If you cannot see the anti-vaccine bias in that "quiz" I do not know what to say.
The vaccines are now known to prevent COVID-19. That information comes from real world evidence from multiple sources. Therefore, the approved answer to question #1 is false based on what is known now. Similarly, the answers to many of the other questions are moot because ... we know more now.
If you cannot see the anti-vaccine bias in that "quiz" I do not know what to say.
The vaccines are now known to prevent COVID-19. That information comes from real world evidence from multiple sources. Therefore, the approved answer to question #1 is false based on what is known now. Similarly, the answers to many of the other questions are moot because ... we know more now.
Not looking at the quiz, but it's also a known fact that just a helluva lot of people didn't get COVID to begin with. And a helluva lot of these people haven't been vaccinated and STILL haven't gotten it.
While the numbers may be very small, people who've been vaccinated HAVE contracted COVID afterward. It's not a fix-all and I can't even tell you how many times I've heard the medical officials pointing that out.
Test to see if the government propaganda was effective..................... there is a right answer and a politically correct answer.
Enough evidence the public is being misled by the likes of Fauci and others by using politicized science which equates to a pure political narrative disguised as a valid interpretation of scientific data.
Imagine the state of confusion we would be in in a real existential crisis.
People better wake up and begin electing actual leaders, not political players.
the government is not a friend of science
Fauci is especially tainted, given his slimey behavior.
Alternative Rx for covid, does not exist.
Why is that?
Why knock off label Rx that have proven effective, like hydroxy and ivermectin, et al??
Fauci uses technical language as a weapon. there are no studies which support the use of hydroxy - TRUE, however, drugs are prescribed off label by doctors as a general practice. It means when a drug is approved only for specific indications listed in the labeling, pharma and federal agencies cannot promote their use for unlisted indications. doctors can legally prescribe "off label" and often do. Faucie neglected to say that. Failing to give that perspective Fauci intentionally misled the public.
It is not permissible to use vaccines under the label of 'approved for emergency use ONLY', if there existed alternative treatments. So crush the idea that alternative treatments exist by wordsmithing and suppression of information by the media
Be very afraid as a society, when the media condemns and silences voices who bring up a discussion of alternative treatments. they are rabidly entrenched in political narratives by the government. they are supposed to be independent and hold the government accountable for misleading information and lies. Instead they embrace the government as they await their orders.
the end result of customizing the message, using government shills like fauci, is loss of trust in elected leadership.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
loss of trust by lying and misleading the public
