Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-19-2021, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,349,192 times
Reputation: 2610

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
It's murder if she gets intentionally thrown off a bridge on her way to get an abortion.

But the intentional killing of the baby via abortion is not murder.

Both are intentional killings ... baby is intentionally dead in both scenarios... yet you see one is murder and one is not.

Cognitive dissonance. No way around that.
It's not murder to kill animals. A fetus is best described as a nonhuman animal. It has more in common with nonhuman animals than humans.

Last edited by Clintone; 05-19-2021 at 10:07 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2021, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,349,192 times
Reputation: 2610
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Your argument is with the US Constitution. Don't like it? There's a specifically prescribed Amendment process. If the majority of Americans support abortion at will, there should be no problem getting a Constitutional Amendment ratified to confer that right. So... Get to it!

Mother kills the fetus = not murder, someone else kills a fetus the mother intends to abort = murder? That's yet another violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
Nah...that can't work. With that mentality, there would be no clear line between recently fertilized female eggs and adults. The only sane route is for the Equal Protection Clause to not apply to fetuses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2021, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,349,192 times
Reputation: 2610
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC4Me View Post
Disagree. Basic human rights shouldn’t be dictated by the troglodytes that govern some states.

Yes, it’s still murder because the law deals with what is not what may or may not happen in the future.
Basic human rights should be determined by what makes sense. Abortion typically assists the aborted. Therefore it should be legal. It either has zero negative consequences, in the even that the fetus experienced no pain, or else any unpleasant sensation could be argued to be canceled out by the abortion allowing the would-be child to avoid whatever negative circumstances the parent got the abortion to avoid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2021, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,349,192 times
Reputation: 2610
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
I've met one person who is pro abortion who actually recognized this and was able to say, yes, the mother is intentionally killing her child. It was refreshing to talk to someone who could at least discuss it from a logical, if not moral, perspective. Still felt that the mom was perfectly fine in making that decision, but at least knew it was murder.
I have been discussing it from a moral perspective. I've noticed you haven't. You've just been mostly arbitrarily defining it as "murder" despite the fact that abortion results in absolutely none of the consequences society is so disdainful of murder for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2021, 10:13 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,349,192 times
Reputation: 2610
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
While I don't disagree with you generally (though I see drops across even the middle class . . . the wealthy would just fly to where it's legal), the pro-life crowd will say that even the poor deserve a chance at life.
Then they're fools. By that reasoning people are taking away people's chance at life every time they choose not to procreate by using contraception...which is very true. We are taking away people's chances at living by using contraception...and that in no way harms anyway, and neither do most abortions seem to, for exactly the same reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2021, 10:13 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,934,145 times
Reputation: 18149
Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui View Post
Most reasonable people can agree in theory to the other side’s arguments. Understand how you might see it that way. Doesn’t mean they agree your characterization is right.
My characterization is spot on. Pro abortion person agreed that abortion is murder. There was no other way of understanding the words coming out of his mouth.

The fact that you took the time to tell me that my conversation reflected what YOU BELIEVE rather than what was actually said goes to your confirmation bias.

You cannot believe that someone who supports abortion would also acknowledge that it is murder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2021, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,349,192 times
Reputation: 2610
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Exactly. It's a state legislatures' purview to determine that, not SCOTUS via Roe v. Wade. Roe was an egregious SCOTUS overreach in that SCOTUS does not have the power or authority to confer imaginary new Constitutional Rights.
No...it was not overreach anymore than banning slavery was overreach. Some rights are just so innate that it would be horrifyingly barbaric that they should be removed from anywhere.

Quote:
Is it still murder if the woman was going to abort the fetus? State laws make no distinction and charge it as infanticide regardless of the woman's intentions as to the fetus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2021, 10:16 AM
Status: "Let this year be over..." (set 15 days ago)
 
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,220 posts, read 17,072,760 times
Reputation: 15536
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
That's a state legislature's choice just as much as it was a state's choice to expand Medicaid under the ACA. Some did. Some didn't. Don't like the choice your state made? Move.

It may come as a shock to you that states have different income tax rates, as well, with some states not even charging an income tax. Again... Don't like the choice your state legislature made? Move.
It may come as a shock to you that citizens regardless of where they live either by fate or choice have a right to same basic healthcare options and shouldn't have to move because the religious right is in charge. Of course what state was it that was proposing a rape victim cannot terminate a pregnancy if the rapist objects exercising his parental rights????

Last edited by VA Yankee; 05-19-2021 at 10:44 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2021, 10:17 AM
 
1,925 posts, read 556,859 times
Reputation: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintone View Post
It's not murder to kill animals. A fetus is best described as an animal. It has more in common with animals than humans.
Nonsense! What animal have you known a human fetus to become? When a pregnant woman is asked what she is going to have, the answer is usually boy or girl......not rabbit or dog. What a stretch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2021, 10:18 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,934,145 times
Reputation: 18149
Quote:
Originally Posted by VA Yankee View Post
It may come as a shock to you that citizens regardless of where they live either by fate or choice have a right to same basic healthcare options and shouldn't have to move because the religious right is in charge. Of course what state was it that was proposing a rape victim cannot terminate a pregnancy if the rapist objects exercising his parental rights)????
Healthcare addresses medical illnesses and conditions.

What medical illness does abortion treat?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top