Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-13-2021, 10:42 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,464,356 times
Reputation: 4799

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by warhorse78 View Post
I wonder sometimes if the democrats are playing reverse psychology. They say they are all for the rights of the LGBT community, but when they push for this nonsense, they in turn start creating hate for the LGBT community. They are also using this to attack women as well even though they claim to be for women's rights?
That’s a real problem they’re trying to “synthesize” as we speak. Queering of categories is an attempt to destroy them. That is leaving many of the marganilized alphabet in a bit of a cunudrum. Not sure where it will end up exactly but it’s purpose will be to destroy the idea of normative behavior which destroys so many sections of the pillars of Western hegemony that they have taken aim at.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-13-2021, 10:48 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,464,356 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellwood View Post
How is it possible that so many quirky and unintelligent people believe they can make these overt decisions for the American people? It seems this country has a large brain drain.
They’ve positioned themselves in places of power that allow them to do that. Please read Bella Dodd’s testimony:

Senate Internal Security Subcommittee, 1952-1953

I realize it’s long and people will tend to shy away from that but that’s not going to be helpful at all. This ideology is all encompassing and it creates a new reality for the people that believe in it. That means this is their life and their whole schema. A life long “struggle” for the “long march through the institutions.”

None of this is beneficial to anyone if that is not abundantly clear, not even to the people who are pushing it. These Uber illiberal totalitarians who are pushing this ideology will be the very first people on the chopping block (whether that’s being cancelled, or worse). You can read about all about how the youth of the Cultural Revolution was used to intimidate society at large into submission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2021, 10:50 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,464,356 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX Wahine View Post
It’s retarded. I don’t know what else to say about it. Language distortion to blur gender lines and in the process undermine women’s role in families and in society.

IT. IS. RETARDED.
It’s a revolution!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2021, 10:56 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,464,356 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
Birthing people is as offensive as the term “breeders”. By trying to be inclusive of a small minority, they are pissing off mothers, the majority. It’s so dumb that the insult has to be on purpose.
That’s nothing. Mother’s will get angry and get over it. Maybe they hold a lifelong grudge and fight the system. Wait until they find out these people are targeting their children. You’ve never seen compassion be so brutal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2021, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,308,762 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by DUNNDFRNT View Post
Why not? Why be upset by it? Its no different that calling "slaves" the enslaved, its a way better term, its more accurate. i dont have an issue with mother, biological mother, birthing people, I am in any one term's camp, use whatever you want, if the govt wants to use the most neutral term possible, why do i care?
changing the 99.7% to appease the socio/psychological issues of the 0.3% isn't the way to go. We've got mother, birth mother, biological mother, adoptive mother and yes, stepmother.

If someone wishes to refer to themselves as a "birthing person", I don't care. But to say we would institutionalize the term is insane.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2021, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,308,762 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
That’s a real problem they’re trying to “synthesize” as we speak. Queering of categories is an attempt to destroy them. That is leaving many of the marganilized alphabet in a bit of a cunudrum. Not sure where it will end up exactly but it’s purpose will be to destroy the idea of normative behavior which destroys so many sections of the pillars of Western hegemony that they have taken aim at.
there's a difference between regular and irregular, normal and abnormal. And abnormal isn't by default "bad". "We had an abnormally rainy May". And there's a difference between deviate and deviant. "Heather has 2 mommies" deviates from the norm, but it's not deviant.

It's one of many attempts to claim abnormal as normal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2021, 11:15 AM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,104 posts, read 18,269,535 times
Reputation: 34977
Well when Hallmark starts putting out "Happy Birthing Person Day" cards in May then we know all hope is lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2021, 11:17 AM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,104 posts, read 18,269,535 times
Reputation: 34977
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
They’ve positioned themselves in places of power that allow them to do that. Please read Bella Dodd’s testimony:

Senate Internal Security Subcommittee, 1952-1953

I realize it’s long and people will tend to shy away from that but that’s not going to be helpful at all. This ideology is all encompassing and it creates a new reality for the people that believe in it. That means this is their life and their whole schema. A life long “struggle” for the “long march through the institutions.”

None of this is beneficial to anyone if that is not abundantly clear, not even to the people who are pushing it. These Uber illiberal totalitarians who are pushing this ideology will be the very first people on the chopping block (whether that’s being cancelled, or worse). You can read about all about how the youth of the Cultural Revolution was used to intimidate society at large into submission.
In the very end though...the only one left with any "power to influence" is government.
Get rid of the religious structure...
Get rid of the family unit.....
Remove all but one pillar of society.

The government will tell you what to think, raise your kids and take care of you.
All you need to do is get a job and give them your money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2021, 11:44 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,464,356 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eyebee Teepee View Post
changing the 99.7% to appease the socio/psychological issues of the 0.3% isn't the way to go. We've got mother, birth mother, biological mother, adoptive mother and yes, stepmother.

If someone wishes to refer to themselves as a "birthing person", I don't care. But to say we would institutionalize the term is insane.
The entire ideology is based on “economy of differences,” linguistic or otherwise. (Marxism mixed with Freudian thought changing it from class to culture attaching it to the psyche internalizing it as opposed to it being an external issue). And because Dr. Robin DiAngelo made us all a pamphlet we now know that these differences exist for forever and they must always be identified in all situation and at all times from now until forever. Did I say forever?

https://robindiangelo.com/wp-content...-page-2016.pdf

I’m no psychologist but it’s pretty clear to everyone that’s not ideologically possessed that there is something wrong with this way of thinking. People even seek help for it knowing how detrimental it is to their daily activities.

As far as we know there can be a differentiation of .000001% and that will still indicate that the system is toxic, racist, patriarchal and illegitimate. They’ve no mention where their line is where they’re not willing to push to abolish the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2021, 11:55 AM
 
Location: near bears but at least no snakes
26,654 posts, read 28,682,916 times
Reputation: 50530
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
In the very end though...the only one left with any "power to influence" is government.
Get rid of the religious structure...
Get rid of the family unit.....
Remove all but one pillar of society.

The government will tell you what to think, raise your kids and take care of you.
All you need to do is get a job and give them your money.
Be careful, you'll fall off the deep end, lol. Someone came up with a stupid word/stupid term. It's more than stupid because it doesn't help anyone, it just creates a backlash of anger and outrage. If the Dems would only learn that. If the Repubs would only learn that too.

Shall we all start believing Qanon and shall we stage a violent attack on our own country? Both sides are crazy, let's admit it. Anyone want to stop arguing with each other and start figuring out how to form a moderate party that makes sense?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top