Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-22-2021, 03:37 PM
 
21,430 posts, read 7,455,334 times
Reputation: 13233

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Who WOULDN'T support voter ID? You know, to make sure that only legal citizens are casting legal votes.....
That is done at time of registration.

States like mine have 'motor voter' laws where the person is eligible to enroll to vote at the DMV. That is one place that makes perfect sense because it is creating the ID everyone seems to be so concerned about.

Once enrolled, all that is required is a signature match at time of voting, which is traditional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-22-2021, 03:42 PM
 
9,434 posts, read 4,252,535 times
Reputation: 7018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
That is done at time of registration.

States like mine have 'motor voter' laws where the person is eligible to enroll to vote at the DMV. That is one place that makes perfect sense because it is creating the ID everyone seems to be so concerned about.

Once enrolled, all that is required is a signature match at time of voting, which is traditional.
In my state most inner city poor do not drive or own cars. Same in nyc. I think it would act as a limitation for a certain class of voters. Not sure if that is an issue country wide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2021, 03:42 PM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,650,100 times
Reputation: 7571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robertfchew View Post
like in 2016 when half the country had full on meltdowns claiming the Russians rigged the elections?
Exactly. I bet you were thinking I would have an excuse for 2016.

I don’t blame Facebook, Russia, etc. She lost, she should’ve put in the work and went back to the rust belt instead of doing victory laps raising cash in states she had locked up.

and I don’t mind people being upset when they lose but stop blaming Russia, illegals and tricknology and just take the L like an adult.

Also, Hillary conceded, she didn’t have a meltdown and demand recounts or call it cheating. Even before the 2016 election Trump was claiming fraud if he lost. That is what you call a sore loser.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2021, 03:55 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,116 posts, read 4,607,373 times
Reputation: 10578
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodyum View Post
I thought everyone wanted a photo Id?

Is it easy to get if you move around a lot? What if you are homeless?
It's situations such as homeless people that make me question voter ID requirements and their constitutionality. It's no problem for me or most people on this forum to have an ID to vote, but for those who are homeless, don't have a vehicle or transportation, or others with unusual circumstances that prevent them from having an ID who have every right to vote absolutely must not have their vote suppressed.

Last edited by Jowel; 06-22-2021 at 04:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2021, 03:59 PM
 
9,504 posts, read 4,340,821 times
Reputation: 10556
I support requiring voters to identify themselves via a state issued identification card.
I support mail-in voting.
I support voting over the internet.


It 2021. Requiring people to travel to a voting station is stupid beyond words. It wastes time, fuel, and is prone to error/fraud.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2021, 03:59 PM
 
Location: USA
2,869 posts, read 1,149,746 times
Reputation: 6481
I absolutely support voter ID.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2021, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Seattle
5,117 posts, read 2,162,262 times
Reputation: 6228
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttboy View Post
Interesting…..

Democrats want to see your vaccine passport. But not your ID to vote.

Funny how that works eh? Great point TT!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2021, 04:06 PM
 
22,472 posts, read 11,995,014 times
Reputation: 20393
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodyum View Post
Where would most poor citizens go to get their ballots notarized if they couldn’t in a govt office or a bank? My social service agency does not take walkins.
When I needed one, I would go to the local Mail Boxes Etc. They had a notary there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2021, 04:10 PM
 
22,472 posts, read 11,995,014 times
Reputation: 20393
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodyum View Post
In my state most inner city poor do not drive or own cars. Same in nyc. I think it would act as a limitation for a certain class of voters. Not sure if that is an issue country wide.
I'm surprised that you haven't seen this:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW2LpFkVfYk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2021, 04:12 PM
 
Location: Rural Wisconsin
19,803 posts, read 9,357,559 times
Reputation: 38343
I mostly read the OP link, and from what I gathered, I absolutely support Joe Manchin's compromise voting rights bill, and I'm a conservative.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jowel View Post
I think it's those situations (homeless people) that make me question voter ID requirements and their constitutionality. It's no problem for me or most people on this forum to have an ID to vote, but for those who are homeless, don't have a vehicle or transportation, or others with unusual circumstances that prevent them from having an ID who have every right to vote absolutely must not have their vote suppressed.
I know this will shock some people, but I do NOT think that making sure that the homeless vote should be much of a priority. Yes, their situation might be through no fault of their own, but the fact is that they, in my opinion, contribute nothing worthwhile to this county, so I do not think they should have a say as to how it is run. And as far as some people making frequent moves, I have probably moved at least 15 times in my adult life (probably closer to 20), and I have always managed to vote without too much trouble -- meaning that, yes, it has been something of a hassle a couple of times, but I still managed to vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top