Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Those endowments were built off the backs of slave labor donated by wealthy white people to these universities. Those endowments need to be given as reparations to people in the black community.
What liberal BS.
The contribution of black slaves to the US in the past was that of a beast of burden, no more than a horse or a mule.
The factories, innovation, and patents that have resulted in modern society and the US were created nearly exclusively by white males.
Given the expense caused by all the crimes committed by blacks and welfare payments, black America would be in the red relative to any compensation paid for the agricultural work performed by their ancestors.
Further, it was not the federal government, but private citizens, who bought and used slaves. Yet, that was 155 years ago and any statute of limitations would have long passed.
Instead of attempting to extort money from the nation, why not avoid criminal activity, study hard in an area in which the economy rewards high incomes, and maintain two parent families? That is the way most people obtain money, rather than begging or grifting.
better yet withhold tax from the government for one year
what would happen if you gave a drug addict 1,000$$?????????????????????????
otherwise remove all politicians from office and there might be a chance.... expect fraud, that's what the government tolerates and figures into its budget.
better yet withold tax from the government for one year.
If everyone's income will be confiscated, people will simply stop working, as there would be no point. Almost overnight, we would see a total economic collapse. Law and order, which is already under strain thanks to the BLM and "defund the police" nutcases, would dissolve into total anarchy. Far from paying down the debt, the government would desperately try and cling to power, spending more and more money that they don't have, until the money became worthless and the government collapsed.
Instead, let's try this novel approach: the government should stop spending more than it takes in. I know, crazy, right?
So you would be required to work your regular job but tap into your savings to live for one year, all of us, or else cash out your retirement but all so we can repay this stimulus debt back together
You also if your credit is good, charge your daily living to a visa charge card but you’ll need to cash out savings or retirement to make the min payments
100% of pretax income would be a tax liability to the IRS but only for one year, and penalties for not working the same as past years
You also can liquidate your home but you only get to keep the book value and any proceeds above that go to IRS but only if you sell your home in that one year
I have an idea, don't you write ideas for a while. I'm not going to work for the government to even take 50%, let alone 100%. This is a recipe for WAR. You seen the movie Escape from New York? They have to make a new one call "Escape from D.C." and it would be reality t.v.
So you would be required to work your regular job but tap into your savings to live for one year, all of us, or else cash out your retirement but all so we can repay this stimulus debt back together
You also if your credit is good, charge your daily living to a visa charge card but you’ll need to cash out savings or retirement to make the min payments
100% of pretax income would be a tax liability to the IRS but only for one year, and penalties for not working the same as past years
You also can liquidate your home but you only get to keep the book value and any proceeds above that go to IRS but only if you sell your home in that one year
Putting aside the absurdity of this suggestion, I'm more interested to know if you actually think there is some merit in the proposal. Why did you come up with this?
So you would be required to work your regular job but tap into your savings to live for one year, all of us, or else cash out your retirement but all so we can repay this stimulus debt back together
You also if your credit is good, charge your daily living to a visa charge card but you’ll need to cash out savings or retirement to make the min payments
100% of pretax income would be a tax liability to the IRS but only for one year, and penalties for not working the same as past years
You also can liquidate your home but you only get to keep the book value and any proceeds above that go to IRS but only if you sell your home in that one year
Well, the economy would go PHBBBBT. And we would all rise as one and beat the living hell out of the politicians. While that last part doesn't sound too bad, uniting all of us behind a common cause, let's not do that to the economy, OK?
Putting aside the absurdity of this suggestion, I'm more interested to know if you actually think there is some merit in the proposal. Why did you come up with this?
Check out his other threads. It might give you a hint. What I don't understand is why people keep responding.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
better yet withhold tax from the government for one year
