Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Teaching history and being honest about how it impacted different groups isn’t indoctrination.
Its just history.
if this is really, honestly the case, then the inclusion of a few more points of data about American racism that you feel is lacking in the current curriculum would suffice. It would be acceptable to you for schools to just include more info on say redlining and other things and exclude the marxist inspired oppressor/oppressed group power theoretical aspect, as well the people behind CRT.
But that wouldnt suffice, because the theoretical aspect is really what its all about, the complaints about curriculum not showing enough bad stuff is the trojan horse cover.
Proof positive that the brainwashing is working...~~~
The dems love to change names of things. It's still crap.
Didn't they take history out of schools and added this racist crap? Dems think we don't know what's going on and think they are fooling people by changing words. They're pathetic.
Corrupt Joe, Uncle Joe, Puppet Joe, Puppet Whispers Joe, Peepad Joe...no matter what you call him he's got dementia.
I'm going to miss the dems in 2024. It's going to be weird going back to normal and not having all these crazy ideas pop up each day. If nothing else it's been entertaining. They are bat sh*t crazy.
They're going to keep changing words a million times to Sunday
Bottom line is we must eradicate anything that:
puts people into mandatory groups and takes away individualism
assigns group guilt based on immutable characteristics
assumes if outcome is unfavorable, you were oppressed
teaches that virtues are part of white systems, ie black kids don't need to get the right answer
Any K-12 curriculum that changes the approach to learning to something like viewing "through the lens" of race or gender is a big giant red flag for worship at the altar of the woke church and is part of Critical Theory and MUST BE COMPLETELY ERADICATED
People should ignore whatever garbage name the left wants to call it. Call it for what it is-white supremacy veiled as "just teaching history." What they're doing is telling children white people are superior, and black people, by virtue of their skin color, are so pathetic and helpless they'll never accomplish anything in life. Use their own tactics against them. They can call it baked potato salad in turtle soup, but their arguments will still be the same.
They're going to keep changing words a million times to Sunday
Bottom line is we must eradicate anything that:
puts people into mandatory groups and takes away individualism
assigns group guilt based on immutable characteristics
assumes if outcome is unfavorable, you were oppressed
teaches that virtues are part of white systems, ie black kids don't need to get the right answer
Any K-12 curriculum that changes the approach to learning to something like viewing "through the lens" of race or gender is a big giant red flag for worship at the altar of the woke church and is part of Critical Theory and MUST BE COMPLETELY ERADICATED
Yes Yes Yes. You preach the truth! Push back, resist!!! Don't roll over and just accept it. These racist in the White House just want to spread racism. We need to stop it.
“Intersectionality” means the examination of race, sex, class, national origin, and sexual orientation, and how their combination plays out in various settings. These categories—and still others—can be separate disadvantaging factors. What happens when an individual occupies more than one of these categories, for example, is both gay and Native American, or both female and black? Individuals like these exist at an intersection of recognized sites of oppression. Do such cases require that each disadvantaging factor be considered separately, additively, or in yet some other fashion? Should persons who experience multiple forms of oppression have their own categories and representation, apart from those that correspond to the separate varieties of discrimination they incur? And what about the role of these “intersectional” persons in social movements such as feminism or gay liberation? Where do they belong? These are all questions that intersectional analysis attempts to address.
Ask them to explain how Intersectionality is any different than individualism and watch them contort themselves as they try to explain why some people deserve more privileges than others based on, guess who, the people that came up with the ideology. American Black Radical Feminist.
And when thinking about Intersectionality it is no different than the alphabet soups of our militarized government. The whole purpose was to unite everyone but white males against white males.
Apparently Intersectionality turned the feminist world upside down back in the day. It both united them but put groups like white feminist in the back of the line behind, you guessed it, black radical feminist.
Intersectionality is why you have these kids identifying as elephants. It's an outcry and an attempt to garner the most sympathy possible. It's why they'll have as their speakers trans black feminist with antisocial personality disorders as their leaders. They're the loudest, the most self absorbed and they carry all the correct and mostest flare.
Last edited by BigJon3475; 06-28-2021 at 09:20 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
