So what are your three greatest concerns for the future of the U.S. right now? (health care, weapon)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, I am not concerned with "great depression". I am concerned with global economy collapse and digital concentration camp coming. It'll hit so bad, GD will be cakewalk. Those of you who survived through the USSR collapse and early 90s there, know, what I am talking about.
1. Resource and energy depletion
2. Increasing societal and political dysfunction
3. Open savagery, debauchery, and degeneracy becoming increasingly common.
One of the important and often overlooked protections our nation has against potential government overthrow is the non-centralization of elections and the police. Right now some dictator wanna-be manages to get some general to go along with his grand plans they have to contend with 1000’s of Sheriff Billy Bobs and Chief Smiths.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
1.) The GOP fulfilling their dream of an autocracy/dictatorship.
2.) Science denial.
3.) Voting rights.
4.) Climate change.
Please go compare how the Governors of "Blue" States handled the Pandemic compared to how the Governors of "Red" States handled it. Then come back and tell us who you think acted as more of a dictator?
Please go compare how the Governors of "Blue" States handled the Pandemic compared to how the Governors of "Red" States handled it. Then come back and tell us who you think acted as more of a dictator?
Well since blues states are getting back to normal now whereas red states are still dealing with this pandemic ....I would say blue states did much better.
Aging Infrastructure of suburbs combined with lower population growth, the cities, that can replace it's empty-nesters will do fine but not everywhere can or will do that, and some towns are just built far to sprawl-y to maintain themselves as time moves on. I'm fine with lowered population growth, but I think low density sprawl in a declining area population wise might lead to a physical decline even in nice areas. These areas might not get bad, but once more and more houses become available some areas might just empty.
Home affordability. Because cities have generally improved significantly since the 1970-1980s, affordability will become an issue in the desirable areas. This contradicts my first point, but it's largely because the desirable and thus expensive areas are going to be desirable especially to immigrants as more of the rest of the country declines, and i'm not sure where the breaking point is, that people forsake Phoenix/Houston/Dallas/Atlanta/Sunbelt not to mention the East and West Coasts+SLC+Denver for either cheaper sunbelt cities, or the cheapest Midwest cities. These cities aren't that expensive but as the first 4 approach 10,000,000, and places like Pittsburgh lose 500,000 residents in the metro area, will they become expensive enough that Greater Pittsburgh sees it's suburbs and coal towns get replenished.
Inflation, the inflation rate has been really high this year, and it's unlikely to go down all the way to pre-2020 levels, so some basics are likely just going to be permanently more expensive which sucks.
I don't think Democrats or Republicans are a major threat to anything foundational, so I have a more positive view of the future in general.
Republicans undermining the Constitution running an authoritarian mafia style dictatorship.
Civil war.
Climate change.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.