Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It would have been better with an actual article. I could hardly understand a word that first woman said, so I gave up watching the video altogether.
It was probably impossible to find anyone who could translate that psychotic rant.
it was a long diatribe against anyone who is 'anti-' all her favorite leftist causes, followed up with 'let them die' at the end.
then applause.
Man, that guy is SPOT ON. We need many more of him. And was he ever prepared for the kick-down Benito thought he was going to give him. The guy quoted straight from the Supreme Court. How do you argue with that? Benito couldn't. Poor moron.
That guys is just wrong, his example that someone attacked him on a school board meeting, and they did not want to post the video so he told the board, "you better put that up, before we get sued for violating freedom of speech" that has nothing to do with freedom of speech, it doesn't seem like that guy has a grasp of the concept. The constitution doesnt guarantee publication of your voice, distribution of your thoughts, archiving of your speech. I dont know what he went on to say but that was a completely ridiculous statement that he started with.
Does anyone else notice a trend, that the fatter the people are (regardless of ideology), the angrier they tend to be??? Certainly there are exceptions, but there does seem to be a remarkable trend between grotesque figure and rage.
That guys is just wrong, his example that someone attacked him on a school board meeting, and they did not want to post the video so he told the board, "you better put that up, before we get sued for violating freedom of speech" that has nothing to do with freedom of speech, it doesn't seem like that guy has a grasp of the concept. The constitution doesnt guarantee publication of your voice, distribution of your thoughts, archiving of your speech. I dont know what he went on to say but that was a completely ridiculous statement that he started with.
Then I guess the supreme court was just wrong as well, since he directly quoted a transcript of their decision.
And on the issue of "rebroadcasting" a public meeting: if you don't see a problem with any official body editing out all the things they didn't like from a public meeting and then posting it as "a transcript of that meeting" then you are certainly PART of the problem. Because, at that point, it is no longer a transcript of the meeting, it is rhetoric.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
