Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-04-2021, 10:24 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
2,033 posts, read 1,983,459 times
Reputation: 1437

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
A large majority of the American people support abortion so if RvW was to be overruled that would not be short lived victory. A vast majority don't want to make it 1970, most see this as a very right wing assault on personal freedom. This falls under the heading of be careful what you ask for you may get what you want.

The conservative justices want to narrow rights, that is unsupported by the voting public.
If that is the case then why are so many people worried about RvW getting overturned. If the majority of people are for abortions then it shouldn’t be a huge obstacle for voters to elect representatives in the federal and state legislatures to enact laws protecting abortion rights. That is what is supposed to happen, not run to nine attorneys dressed in robes to draw up laws out of thin air. That is not the duty of SCOTUS.

 
Old 12-04-2021, 10:32 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
2,033 posts, read 1,983,459 times
Reputation: 1437
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
What anchor babies are you talking about. If you are born in the US then you are a citizen according to our constitution.
Read the amendment, it say “Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof”. Their parents are not nationals of this country. Their allegiance is to a foreign country.

I won’t go further in this matter because it’s not the topic of this thread.

The point I was trying to make is people are concerned about the financial strain on government having to force women to give birth, but nobody seems to be concerned about the cost of illegals giving birth here in the US and putting a financial strain on government social programs.
 
Old 12-04-2021, 10:38 PM
Status: "It Can't Rain All The Time" (set 28 days ago)
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,592,007 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastphilly View Post
Read the amendment, it say “Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof”. Their parents are not nationals of this country. Their allegiance is to a foreign country.

I won’t go further in this matter because it’s not the topic of this thread.

The point I was trying to make is people are concerned about the financial strain on government having to force women to give birth, but nobody seems to be concerned about the cost of illegals giving birth here in the US and putting a financial strain on government social programs.
I wouldn't worry about that either ...

A Smaller, Wealthier Mexico Is on the Horizon

"Lower birth rates and freer markets have led to a sustained drop in Mexicans moving north to find work, developments that will reshape the immigration debate in the United States. "


When they can find work at home, they'll stay home. Mexico already has the low income programs, one in which is cash payout to single moms ...
 
Old 12-04-2021, 10:43 PM
 
34,037 posts, read 17,050,952 times
Reputation: 17197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastphilly View Post
If that is the case then why are so many people worried about RvW getting overturned. If the majority of people are for abortions then it shouldn’t be a huge obstacle for voters to elect representatives in the federal and state legislatures to enact laws protecting abortion rights. That is what is supposed to happen, not run to nine attorneys dressed in robes to draw up laws out of thin air. That is not the duty of SCOTUS.
 
Old 12-04-2021, 10:49 PM
 
32,060 posts, read 15,052,579 times
Reputation: 13678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastphilly View Post
If that is the case then why are so many people worried about RvW getting overturned. If the majority of people are for abortions then it shouldn’t be a huge obstacle for voters to elect representatives in the federal and state legislatures to enact laws protecting abortion rights. That is what is supposed to happen, not run to nine attorneys dressed in robes to draw up laws out of thin air. That is not the duty of SCOTUS.
It’s the Supreme Court deciding not elected officials
 
Old 12-04-2021, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Polynesia
2,704 posts, read 1,830,243 times
Reputation: 4826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastphilly View Post
If that is the case then why are so many people worried about RvW getting overturned. If the majority of people are for abortions then it shouldn’t be a huge obstacle for voters to elect representatives in the federal and state legislatures to enact laws protecting abortion rights. That is what is supposed to happen, not run to nine attorneys dressed in robes to draw up laws out of thin air. That is not the duty of SCOTUS.
It is a huge obstacle because of extreme gerrymandering and voter suppression. Gerrymandering is deeply undemocratic. It leaves many citizens rightfully feeling like their vote doesn't count and gives legislative power to the minority rather than the majority.
 
Old 12-04-2021, 11:03 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
2,033 posts, read 1,983,459 times
Reputation: 1437
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
It’s the Supreme Court deciding not elected officials
This matter should not be in the supreme courts hands. Listen to Kavanaugh’s statement. He specifies the court should have neutrality in this case. Meaning this matter should be taken up by the people and their elected officials. He was the only justice that had it correct. In fact, the only argument here is not if abortion should be illegal, but what is the definition of viability? How on God’s green earth should that decision be left to the court? Where is their expertise in this matter? Furthermore, this matter has nothing to do with the constitution whatsoever. The term “Liberty” in this matter has been stretched to mean just about anything even the killing of helpless human beings.
 
Old 12-04-2021, 11:13 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
2,033 posts, read 1,983,459 times
Reputation: 1437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butterflyfish View Post
It is a huge obstacle because of extreme gerrymandering and voter suppression. Gerrymandering is deeply undemocratic. It leaves many citizens rightfully feeling like their vote doesn't count and gives legislative power to the minority rather than the majority.
That still doesn’t change the fact that SCOTUS is not a legislative body.
 
Old 12-05-2021, 01:07 AM
 
34,037 posts, read 17,050,952 times
Reputation: 17197
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
It’s the Supreme Court deciding not elected officials
SC decided in Roe, improperly as making the decision was a state's right, not the Supreme Court's decision. I'd say that even had they disallowed abortion nationally. It is not the fed's decision, either way.

This case will likely result in the decision being handed back to local government, whose officials are elected freely by their constituents.

This SC is properly against massive SC control. The decision you fear is not going to be SCOTUS deciding; it will be SCOTUS saying "abortion legislation is NOT our decision to make". I agree with the point in quotes 100%.
 
Old 12-05-2021, 02:39 AM
 
33,321 posts, read 12,511,334 times
Reputation: 14937
Quote:
Originally Posted by YourWakeUpCall View Post
Prior to Roe vs Wade, women had choices in how to "manage the decision". You do know where babies come from, right? Don't want a baby? Don't do that thing that results in pregnancy. Not sure why this is so hard to grasp. Might have something to do with the fact that the concept of personal responsibility and accountability is a completely alien concept to some folks. Perform the action, accept the consequences. It's called being an adult.


Or don't have the bad luck of getting raped.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top