Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-05-2022, 04:27 PM
 
6,073 posts, read 4,749,948 times
Reputation: 2635

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
76 years ago today, on August 5, 1945, the first atomic bomb used in war was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan. (In Japan it was August 6, since they are across the International Date Line from us.)

Three days later, the second atomic bomb used in warfare was flown to its primary target of Kokura, Japan. They found the city obscured by clouds and smoke, and so flew to the secondary target of Nagasaki instead and dropped the bomb there.

Shortly afterward, Japan realized they had no way to stop the Americans from dropping bomb after bomb, wiping out city after city until the Japanese islands became uninhabitable. It also helped that Russia declared war on Japan that day. Japan surrendered, and WWII was over.

Japan didn't know at the time, that those were the only two complete atomic bombs the Americans had been able to produce at that time (plus one more set off in July as a test in New Mexico). They could eventually produce more of the needed fissile material, but it would have taken a while, so the Americans kept quiet. The head of the Manhattan Project, Gen. Leslie Groves expected to have another "Fat Man" (plutonium, as was dropped on Nagasaki) atomic bomb ready for use on 19 August, with three more in September and a further three in October; a second Little Boy bomb (using U-235, the typed dropped on Hiroshima) would not be available until December 1945.

The Army estimated that those two bombs, which killed approx. 150,000 Japanese, saved the lives of between 500,000 and 1 million Americans who would no longer have to invade the Japanese home islands to force a surrender, plus saving a million or more Japanese who would have defended their homes to the death.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic...a_and_Nagasaki
and thank god they did. think of how many lives were saved by dropping the bombs and being done with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2022, 04:44 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
7,320 posts, read 3,804,222 times
Reputation: 5273
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanonka View Post
Nuking was not needed at all.
Here is the factual write up:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30...an-stalin-did/
More like a bull**** write up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2022, 07:00 PM
 
Location: King County, WA
15,828 posts, read 6,536,770 times
Reputation: 13325
The firebombing of Tokyo on March 9-10, 1945 was the most destructive bombing attack in human history. Let us hope we never see its like again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2022, 07:14 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,868 posts, read 26,498,769 times
Reputation: 25768
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanonka View Post
Nuking was not needed at all.
Here is the factual write up:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30...an-stalin-did/
What did the Japanese have to fear from Russia? Russia's navy was basically non-existent. They couldn't achieve supremacy of the seas, let alone perform any kind of amphibious invasion. It's as laughable as Germany's "Operation Sea Lion" was to "invade" Great Britain. The invasion of the Japanese Home Islands would have been horrific and bloody for the US Navy and Marines, with our 24 Essex class "fleet" type aircraft carriers, a fleet of amphibious landing ships and craft and a Marine Corp trained for amphibious landings.

You're trying to re-write history in order to demonize America's actions. The actions of Japan were every bit as vile as were the Nazis. They slaughtered as many defenseless Chinese as the Nazis did Jews (and IIRC as many as they did Russians as well). They conducted horrific medical experiments on living humans. And they routinely slaughtered and tortured American POWs, something even the Nazis didn't do on a regular basis. If the use of nuclear weapons saved one American life, they were perfectly justified.

Last edited by Toyman at Jewel Lake; 08-05-2022 at 07:34 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2022, 12:44 AM
 
303 posts, read 128,337 times
Reputation: 627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
What did the Japanese have to fear from Russia? Russia's navy was basically non-existent. They couldn't achieve supremacy of the seas, let alone perform any kind of amphibious invasion. It's as laughable as Germany's "Operation Sea Lion" was to "invade" Great Britain. The invasion of the Japanese Home Islands would have been horrific and bloody for the US Navy and Marines, with our 24 Essex class "fleet" type aircraft carriers, a fleet of amphibious landing ships and craft and a Marine Corp trained for amphibious landings.

You're trying to re-write history in order to demonize America's actions. The actions of Japan were every bit as vile as were the Nazis. They slaughtered as many defenseless Chinese as the Nazis did Jews (and IIRC as many as they did Russians as well). They conducted horrific medical experiments on living humans. And they routinely slaughtered and tortured American POWs, something even the Nazis didn't do on a regular basis. If the use of nuclear weapons saved one American life, they were perfectly justified.
The lives of 200 000 people from your country are worth less than one life from my country. That certainly doesn't display the absolute worst kind of ultranationalist thinking does it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2022, 02:25 AM
 
8,886 posts, read 4,578,846 times
Reputation: 16242
My only problems with the use of the nukes is that we quit too soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2022, 02:28 AM
 
Location: Metro Seattle Area - Born and Raised
4,901 posts, read 2,055,276 times
Reputation: 8655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Americas holocaust. Truman ignored Japans peace overtures so he incinerate hundreds of thousands of civilians as an egotistical warning to the Russians. If there is a hell, Truman is sitting next to Hitler
The Japanese proposed several unreasonable items for peace, which included that “THEY” would conduct their own trials on “THEIR” own war criminals, no American occupation forces would be allowed on Japanese soil and several other demands like keeping all of Korea as Japanese territory.

The Americans, British, French, Australians, Dutch and so on demanded UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER OF ALL JAPANESE ARMED FORCES and military occupation of all of Japan…. The same thing that was demanded of the Germans a few months earlier.

Japan started the war, killed thousand of Prisoners of War and there are factual and documented cases of Japanese soldiers eating POWs, raping, murdering thousands of unarmed civilians forcing Chineses, Korean, Vietnamese and Filipino women into force prostitution for their soldiers…. Please read the Rape of Nanking before you attempt to blame America for dropping two atomic bombs on Japan. I would bet that you will change your mind about Japanese guilt of war crimes and the justification of the dropping of atomic bombs on them.

Frank, regardless of what you think or who you what to blame, but the two facts remain. First, those two bombs saved millions of lives on both sides. Second, Japan started the war in the Pacific and guilty of thousands of war crimes against POWs and civilians

A little known fact, but the British were scheduled to drop the third American atomic bomb on Japan.

Another little known fact, even after announced their surrender, they murdered hundreds of POWs to hide their crimes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2022, 03:52 AM
 
Location: Habsburg Lands of Old
908 posts, read 441,596 times
Reputation: 790
Regardless of their purported necessity in military terms , I still take the stance that Hiroshima ( along with Nagasaki ) ranks amongst the greatest day length tragedies in all of human history , and that making a tradition out of remembering its victims would be anything but an affront to American patriotism IMHO .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2022, 04:05 AM
 
8,136 posts, read 3,671,773 times
Reputation: 2718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
What did the Japanese have to fear from Russia? Russia's navy was basically non-existent. They couldn't achieve supremacy of the seas, let alone perform any kind of amphibious invasion. It's as laughable as Germany's "Operation Sea Lion" was to "invade" Great Britain. The invasion of the Japanese Home Islands would have been horrific and bloody for the US Navy and Marines, with our 24 Essex class "fleet" type aircraft carriers, a fleet of amphibious landing ships and craft and a Marine Corp trained for amphibious landings.

You're trying to re-write history in order to demonize America's actions. The actions of Japan were every bit as vile as were the Nazis. They slaughtered as many defenseless Chinese as the Nazis did Jews (and IIRC as many as they did Russians as well). They conducted horrific medical experiments on living humans. And they routinely slaughtered and tortured American POWs, something even the Nazis didn't do on a regular basis. If the use of nuclear weapons saved one American life, they were perfectly justified.
Lol. You might want to read the link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2022, 05:58 AM
 
9,504 posts, read 4,339,161 times
Reputation: 10556
None of us probably have enough information to render judgement either way (whether the bombing was justified or not), but in my mind, the bombing of Hiroshima was one of the darkest days in US history. I can't even begin to imagine the soul searching US leaders did before making the decision or the horror endured by the victims. It breaks my heart that we (the world) can't find a better way to resolve our differences other than exterminating tens of thousands of people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top