Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-01-2021, 11:19 PM
 
1,951 posts, read 699,409 times
Reputation: 560

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Sounds like your partisanship has blinded you to some facts.


The US negotiated with and agreed to troop withdrawal by 5/1/2021 with the Taliban in 2020.

Trump Admin reduced troops to 2500 in 1/2021 and facilitated the release of 5000 Taliban fighters from Afghan prisons.

It was known the Taliban was going to take control.
ya so,
(1) what is the problem talking to the Taliban? Both GOPs and Dems did it. It seemed that it was not a bad thing.
(2) we all knew withdrawal was not a bad thing. So, what was the problem with reducing troops?
(3) Are you sure the Taliban is bad? It seems that Dems like the Taliban more than Gops like the Taliban. 5K fighters killed no US troops, but Biden Admin killed 13 (??) US troops because they gave up the airbase where ISIS fighters were imprisoned.
(4) Are you sure about Taliban was going to take control? did you hear the vote of confidence from POTUS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X20mGH266r4
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-02-2021, 01:23 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,598 posts, read 9,437,319 times
Reputation: 22935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ube2021 View Post
Why are people so obsessed with Bagram Air base? Kabul Airport is literally a short walk from the expat areas of Kabul. Bagram Airport would be akin to taking people through a shooting range before getting there.
Because it had thousands of ISIS prisoners that were freed?

Bagram had a secure airfield that used choppers to transport people all around Afghanistan. Kabul airport isn’t safe, as you saw last month.

You can’t just give up Bagram:
Quote:
'The next time we go there, if we need to go there, the 82nd Airborne will probably be the guys that need to take it by force. And then there will be a big expense in dollars and blood to make it happen.'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ral-warns.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2021, 05:50 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,091,022 times
Reputation: 11535
As he is assaulted for his lies he is going to become vicious. just like a cornered junkyard dog.

watch is happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2021, 05:53 AM
 
Location: Huntsville
6,009 posts, read 6,659,943 times
Reputation: 7042
Quote:
Originally Posted by serger View Post
Lol. So during the 20 years that US was in control there were no attacks, bombings, nothing whatsoever? Everything was prevented?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
Because it had thousands of ISIS prisoners that were freed?

Bagram had a secure airfield that used choppers to transport people all around Afghanistan. Kabul airport isn’t safe, as you saw last month.

You can’t just give up Bagram:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ral-warns.html
This. If people only knew the importance of that AB, they wouldn't be so quick to pop off goofy comments. It was the one place that was safer than anywhere else in Afghanistan. Until it got handed over.

If some of these leftists actually knew people who lived at that AB, they would sing a different tune. Must be nice to live in their own little bubble where the only fighting comes from protesting in the streets. If we didn't have people in places like Bagram fighting to keep our freedoms here (even to protest), and keep the attention span of the terrorists over there, a street protest here would probably end much differently. Just ask anyone in countries like China.

Assuming that you can find one. Protestors just disappear over there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2021, 06:28 AM
 
8,118 posts, read 3,663,787 times
Reputation: 2713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nlambert View Post
This. If people only knew the importance of that AB, they wouldn't be so quick to pop off goofy comments. It was the one place that was safer than anywhere else in Afghanistan. Until it got handed over.

If some of these leftists actually knew people who lived at that AB, they would sing a different tune. Must be nice to live in their own little bubble where the only fighting comes from protesting in the streets. If we didn't have people in places like Bagram fighting to keep our freedoms here (even to protest), and keep the attention span of the terrorists over there, a street protest here would probably end much differently. Just ask anyone in countries like China.

Assuming that you can find one. Protestors just disappear over there.
Nice deflection. Didn't help.
You cannot transport 100 thousand + from Kabul to Bagram. End of story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2021, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,598 posts, read 9,437,319 times
Reputation: 22935
Quote:
Originally Posted by OleManRiber View Post
Because half this forum are retired 4 star generals
The generals also wanted to stay in Afghanistan and leave Bagram open.
Quote:
President Biden’s decision to remove all U.S. troops from Afghanistan ran counter to the recommendations of his top military commanders, who feared it could undermine security in the country.

Gen. Frank McKenzie, the commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, Gen. Austin “Scott” Miller, who leads NATO forces in Afghanistan, and Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, all recommended retaining the current force of 2,500 troops while stepping up diplomacy to try to cement a peace agreement, U.S. officials say.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, himself a retired military commander for the region, shared the concerns of the senior officers, cautioning that withdrawing all U.S. troops would suspend what amounted to an insurance policy for maintaining a modicum of stability in the country, the officials said.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-r...an-11618696597

But I guess CD posters know more than our own generals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2021, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,598 posts, read 9,437,319 times
Reputation: 22935
Quote:
Originally Posted by serger View Post
Nice deflection. Didn't help.
You cannot transport 100 thousand + from Kabul to Bagram. End of story.
You can’t have a safe evacuation by freeing thousands of ISIS prisoners and forcing 6,000 troops to be sitting ducks surrounded by terrorists. End of story.

But you’re more than welcome to tell 26 parents that their child’s death was “inevitable” and this was the “only plan.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2021, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Huntsville
6,009 posts, read 6,659,943 times
Reputation: 7042
Quote:
Originally Posted by serger View Post
Nice deflection. Didn't help.
You cannot transport 100 thousand + from Kabul to Bagram. End of story.
No deflection here..... had Bagram been left open and fully operational (at least for now) until everyone but the military were out the U.S. could have had the opportunity to thwart any potential attacks or at the very least re-engage because they would have had the manpower and firepower to oversee the extractions. They could have also continued to hold the ISIS-K and Taliban leaders who rejoined forces once they were released.

Closing down our base and reducing the number of boots on the ground to replace them with terrorists to oversee the extractions was the dumbest decision that could have been made.

It shouldn't require much more than common sense to see that. Instead we handed them a kill roster of every person that wanted to leave (some of which are still there..... and in hiding), opened the flood gates, and then had to hope that we could get everyone out.

One example.... There is one "group" of 23 "people" RIGHT NOW (I won't get into any details, because I can't) that were supposed to leave. 3 were able to leave. 20 are still there in hiding trying to figure out how to get out.

Yet you'll believe this doof saying that everyone who wanted to get out was extracted. A complete lie, but you believe it because you don't know any better. You may want to start paying more attention and pull the blinders off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2021, 07:34 AM
 
8,118 posts, read 3,663,787 times
Reputation: 2713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nlambert View Post
No deflection here..... had Bagram been left open and fully operational (at least for now) until everyone but the military were out the U.S. could have had the opportunity to thwart any potential attacks or at the very least re-engage because they would have had the manpower and firepower to oversee the extractions. They could have also continued to hold the ISIS-K and Taliban leaders who rejoined forces once they were released.

Closing down our base and reducing the number of boots on the ground to replace them with terrorists to oversee the extractions was the dumbest decision that could have been made.

It shouldn't require much more than common sense to see that. Instead we handed them a kill roster of every person that wanted to leave (some of which are still there..... and in hiding), opened the flood gates, and then had to hope that we could get everyone out.

One example.... There is one "group" of 23 "people" RIGHT NOW (I won't get into any details, because I can't) that were supposed to leave. 3 were able to leave. 20 are still there in hiding trying to figure out how to get out.

Yet you'll believe this doof saying that everyone who wanted to get out was extracted. A complete lie, but you believe it because you don't know any better. You may want to start paying more attention and pull the blinders off.
No, I don't believe that. However it is beyond me why any non essential stayed past May (actually should have left prior to that) putting everybody else in danger afterwards. The deal was made February 2020. The end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2021, 07:46 AM
 
8,118 posts, read 3,663,787 times
Reputation: 2713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
You can’t have a safe evacuation by freeing thousands of ISIS prisoners and forcing 6,000 troops to be sitting ducks surrounded by terrorists. End of story.

But you’re more than welcome to tell 26 parents that their child’s death was “inevitable” and this was the “only plan.”
It is a war. A war that should have ended long time ago.

https://www.defense.gov/casualty.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top