Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-19-2021, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,659,971 times
Reputation: 7485

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Indeed-

Now we have a democrat member of Congress on the Armed Services Committee who says it would be "foolhardy to rescue American civilians in Kabul"!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...airport-video/

So not only will they not use US troops to save US citizens (who Biden put in danger by his idiocy- he told them two weeks ago they were not in danger), they are saying it would be "foolish"!

So who will be foolish when the Taliban takes US citizens hostage?
You have this information? When is this scheduled to happen, the hostage taking that you speak of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2021, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,659,971 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Exactly-

Britain and France are having no problem rescuing their civilians with far fewer troops.

The idiot in chief and the dems on The Armed Services Committee say it is "impossible" and "foolhardy".

It just keeps getting more and more bizarre. Everyone knows that liberals are imbeciles, but this is ridiculous.
How many would the Brits and French rescue if 5000 American troops hadn't taken over the airport?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2021, 04:05 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,698 posts, read 34,542,421 times
Reputation: 29285
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
I have no idea why there would be any American outside of Kabul given the withdrawal of troops began in early 2000.
say what!?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2021, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,961 posts, read 22,141,678 times
Reputation: 13796
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...ped-americans/

Another shocker. The British army, without fanfare or excuses saying that extraction of its citizens is not possible, simply do their jobs and take their citizens out of harms way.

Meanwhile, the confused and weak Biden says that the US military cannot help those stranded in Kabul and that they "are on their own" to make it to the airport and he "cannot guarantee their safety". There was never a question as to whether the soldiers from the UK or its leaders would neglect their own citizens in harms way.

The clown the pretends to be the president is becoming more and more of an embarrassment every day. What is considered "impossible" by him are routine, uneventful tasks by other nations.

No wonder the border is in chaos, inflation rising, crime is rising, and our enemies are pressing their advantage everywhere. Biden is "shown up" by other nations simply performing routine, expected tasks. We must remember, however, that routine tasks DO become challenging to demented patients.

This is no different from Benghazi, in this regard. Obama and Hillary had no contingency plan to deal with the possibility that the Benghazi mission might come under attack, even though it had been bombed and attacked in the past.

Anyone with a brain, watching TV, saw that the Taliban were slowly and surely taking over the entire country. Biden even evacuated Bagram air base back in July. They knew full well that the Taliban surrounding Kabul was not only a possibility, but a certainty. And yet they had no contingency plan to deal with it. Geez, talk about refusing to learn from history, Miley and all those fools need to be fired, or forced to resign.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2021, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,961 posts, read 22,141,678 times
Reputation: 13796
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
say what!?
Actually I think the withdrawal from Afghanistan started back when the American Embassy at Kabul was closed on January 30, 1989, due to concerns that the new regime would not be able to maintain security and protect diplomats following the final departure of Soviet forces from the country.


So yeah, she's way off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2021, 04:42 PM
 
2,385 posts, read 1,587,243 times
Reputation: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotkarl View Post
You have no idea how pist off the Brits are right now at the US.
I mean, they are really, really, pist. Along with other nations of course, but we’re supposed to be bro’s with the UK and we totally ephed up.
The UK is a has been. Especially since they left the EU. They have Zero influence in Europe. We don't need the UK, they are not useful to us anymore.

Even the Brits themselves recognize that.

The ‘special relationship’ has run out of time

Quote:
Yet the negotiations that will matter at the climate talks will be between the US and the EU, and then with China and India. The UK has become a bystander. As for trade, Mr Johnson will have to wait his turn behind Brussels. The EU27 provides a market for about 16 per cent of US exports. The UK takes less than 5 per cent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2021, 05:28 PM
 
17,441 posts, read 9,264,553 times
Reputation: 11907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Actually I think the withdrawal from Afghanistan started back when the American Embassy at Kabul was closed on January 30, 1989, due to concerns that the new regime would not be able to maintain security and protect diplomats following the final departure of Soviet forces from the country.


So yeah, she's way off.
The new US Embassy in Kabul was finally completed in July 2016 at a cost of $792 Billion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2021, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
6,968 posts, read 2,699,716 times
Reputation: 7148
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Here you go...

U.S. forces can't help Americans flee to Kabul airport, Pentagon chief says
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/08/18/...hief-says.html

According to ground reports, the Taliban has already violated their "agreement" to allow US citizens safe passage to Kabul airport for evacuation.

The streets leading to the airport are a "kill box" for Taliban. They should be directing them to an alternate location for pickup.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyXrjaX98ms
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2021, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,230 posts, read 18,571,948 times
Reputation: 25799
Because the British Army, the RAF, the Royal Navy, SAS, Marines, etc are true fighting MEN. Not Woke, overly political, corrupted FIGHTING FORCE. God bless them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2021, 06:23 PM
 
30,063 posts, read 18,658,465 times
Reputation: 20877
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
How many would the Brits and French rescue if 5000 American troops hadn't taken over the airport?
Complete deflection ignoring the Biden created crisis and his refusal to help Americans HE placed in peril.

That is conjecture that assumes the Brits and French would have just abandoned their citizens if US troops were not at the airport- unlikely- they are committed to remove their citizens, come hell or high water.

YOU MISSED THE ENTIRE POINTS HERE:

1. There is a crisis of stranded US civilians due to Biden's incompetency

a. two weeks ago he assured american citizens they were in no danger
b. Biden ignored the advice of his military advisors and removed troops PRIOR TO ASSURING THE SAFETY OF US CIVILIANS.

2. The US COULD extract US civilians in Kabul, as other nations are doing, but CHOOSE to abandon them

a. there are far more US troops than British or UK troops to extract US civilians
b. The US told US citizens they "could not guarantee their safety", abandoning them.
c. Biden and the dems on the Armed Services Committe say it is "FOOLISH" to attempt to save US citizens

3. Biden has ASSUMED the Taliban is allowing US citizens through checkpoints to the airport

a. there is no evidence at all that The Taliban is allowing US citizens through checkpoints
b. The Taliban has no intention of cooperating with the Biden admin- they gain nothing.
c. There IS EVIDENCE that the Taliban is PREVENTING people (Americans, Europeans, Afghans) from reaching the airport.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top