Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
she'll probably get a raise from our 'woke' military
Quote:
A video clip of a female U.S. Army soldier who appeared to threaten to shoot American citizens if martial law is ever declared and they refuse to comply with orders has gone viral on social media and triggered widespread backlash.
The clip went viral thanks to Jeremy Darling, a black conservative who posted a snippet of the larger clip to his own TikTok and added his own commentary, warning that the soldier’s words “should be cause for concern.”
The soldier’s words were as follows: “Understand that if active-duty military actually get deployed within the United States, that weapon is not just pointed at other people, other countries. It’s pointed at you. If you do not get in your house when I tell you to, you become the enemy. Martial law.”
Technically, if she was ordered to shoot people, then she'd have to shoot people. If she wasn't ordered, then that's murder. It is most definitely a frightening thought that someone is thinking of martial law. But, there are a lot of kooks out there...
She's a feeble minded 88M at Fort Bliss running her mouth as if she would ever be called on to do anything but be a delivery boy for the real soldiers. I imagine SSGT Bronson had a fun meeting with her commander that likely started out with "Have a seat Private" as a result of her online stupidity.
Technically, if she was ordered to shoot people, then she'd have to shoot people. If she wasn't ordered, then that's murder. It is most definitely a frightening thought that someone is thinking of martial law. But, there are a lot of kooks out there...
Negative ghostrider.
I was deployed after Hurricane Katrina with an active duty unit from the 82nd Airborne Division to prevent people from looting and chaos. We still have ROE (Rules of Engagement) when dealing with civilians. Can’t just open fire on civilians (American civilians nonetheless) because some babyface butterbar fresh out of West Point ordering us to shoot just because it’s marital law
To the Military it would be Martial Law and following orders given, for the Citizens it would be Authoritarian and Tyrannical to which hopefully none would comply.
Isn't she right? During martial law, violators can be shot on sight?
We didn’t even do that to unarmed civilians in Iraq let alone American citizens at home.
You all need to watch less action movies
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
