Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-05-2021, 10:39 PM
 
2,942 posts, read 1,638,776 times
Reputation: 1726

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjshae View Post
Trolling don't change the facts.
Dumb trolling slang, only works for the left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-05-2021, 10:51 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjshae View Post
Trolling don't change the facts.



Back to jail for the oathbreaker. Guilty of being an idiot.



Are you claiming now that you don't support government censorship?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2021, 10:53 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
When they tell you to stop doing XYZ and you continue.. well, back to jail you go.
Stop listening to podcasts deemed by the state to be untruthful or go to jail?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2021, 10:57 PM
 
Location: The High Desert
16,088 posts, read 10,753,057 times
Reputation: 31494
Oops. He got caught, again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2021, 10:58 PM
 
2,709 posts, read 1,040,224 times
Reputation: 1058
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Yes, he did, and in a lot of countries, that would be just fine.

As you say, "back to jail he goes."

But this isn't just any country.

We have a Constitution that prescribes presumed innocence and freedom of Speech and the press.

There is no reason for a man not convicted of a crime to be deprived of the Internet or cell phone usage.

Moreover, the judge admits that the reason for the pre-conviction restrictions is a belief he has and is now enforcing as official state truth.

“It’s now clear that he has not experienced a transformation and that he continues to seek out those conspiracy theories that led to his dangerous conduct on Jan. 6,”

We don't have official state truth in this country because it is antithetical to free speech, a free press and the right of the people to petition Congress for a redress of grievances.

We decide what is truth as individuals.

The danger isn't that crackpots will believe crazy conspiracy theories.

The danger is that the truth will be made a crazy conspiracy theory so that a lie can take its place.


“Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two makes four. If that is granted, all else follows.”

~1984
Very well said.

The judge is abusing his authority. He's either ignorant or downright evil!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2021, 11:26 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artisan10 View Post
Very well said.

The judge is abusing his authority. He's either ignorant or downright evil!


...,i.e., garden variety statist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2021, 11:32 PM
 
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
2,912 posts, read 1,249,265 times
Reputation: 4314
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjshae View Post
Tough. He violated his terms of release. Back to jail he goes. Deal with it.
Sieg Heil
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 12:25 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,368,921 times
Reputation: 14459
For the best night’s sleep in the whole wide world visit county lockup.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 03:04 AM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,903,106 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Yes, he did, and in a lot of countries, that would be just fine.

As you say, "back to jail he goes."

But this isn't just any country.

We have a Constitution that prescribes presumed innocence and freedom of Speech and the press.

There is no reason for a man not convicted of a crime to be deprived of the Internet or cell phone usage.

Moreover, the judge admits that the reason for the pre-conviction restrictions is a belief he has and is now enforcing as official state truth.

“It’s now clear that he has not experienced a transformation and that he continues to seek out those conspiracy theories that led to his dangerous conduct on Jan. 6,”

We don't have official state truth in this country because it is antithetical to free speech, a free press and the right of the people to petition Congress for a redress of grievances.

We decide what is truth as individuals.

The danger isn't that crackpots will believe crazy conspiracy theories.

The danger is that the truth will be made a crazy conspiracy theory so that a lie can take its place.


“Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two makes four. If that is granted, all else follows.”

~1984
If this was a BLM protester, we would not even be having the argument, because you'd be loving that the protester got their's. I would say the same as I am saying now, when you get released before trial, you have an obligation to uphold your end of the release agreement. If you break it, whether you talk driving when your license is frozen due to DUI allegations or a protester asked not to contact or view organizations that radicalized them, you choose the consequences that go with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 03:28 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
If this was a BLM protester, we would not even be having the argument, because you'd be loving that the protester got their's. I would say the same as I am saying now, when you get released before trial, you have an obligation to uphold your end of the release agreement. If you break it, whether you talk driving when your license is frozen due to DUI allegations or a protester asked not to contact or view organizations that radicalized them, you choose the consequences that go with it.
Right, so the presumption of innocence is contingent on the willingness to surrendering other rights, i.e., free speech, free press?

Driving is a privilege regulated by the state you live in.

Free speech is not a regulated privilege.

"Radicalized"?

WTF is radicalized?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top