Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Debate the semantics of natural all you want , but , as I have said many times Homosexuals argueing the fact that animals do it doesnt help their case, Animals eat their own & other's feces also, so if that is what you want to be identified with , by all means! Listen up, if the Bull is humping the other steers instead of the hefers, he gets turned into hamburger. Not really the road you want to go down!
Your straw men are unimpressive. Natural is defined by the merits applicable to what is natural, not by whether it's good, bad, whether you wish to engage in it or not. Natural is that which exists in nature. Don't like it? Don't do it. No one is forcing you to, but do exercise some intellectual honesty and stop building straw men.
A ridiculous red herring. A child is not legally allowed to make his or her own decisions. Adults are fully capable of doing so. The two are simply not the same.
No one is victimized as a result of gay marriage.
Well that is not completely true, IF they adopt a child, some would argue that the children are victimized.
Well that is not completely true, IF they adopt a child, some would argue that the children are victimized.
If I was an adopted child and adopted by a gay couple I would be pretty mad. I would rather have one mother or one father than have 2 moms or 2 fathers.
Your straw men are unimpressive. Natural is defined by the merits applicable to what is natural, not by whether it's good, bad, whether you wish to engage in it or not. Natural is that which exists in nature. Don't like it? Don't do it. No one is forcing you to, but do exercise some intellectual honesty and stop building straw men.
Hey you are the one making the connection, I am just pointing out that animals do a lot of disgusting things naturally , if you want to associate yourself with them, to make your case, go for it. I wouldnt! I choose to believe that peoples behavior is above the base natural behavior of animals!
Perhaps we ought to have an amendment that once and for all declares marriage between a man and a woman as it has been done for centuries. the fact that we even have to legislate something so self evident is a testament to how far we moved away from the traditional Judeo-Christian values that the men who founded this country held. the founders never would have even thought about legislating something so culturally engrained for thousands of years.
The greatest of Christian values is love - CA court affirms that.
Well that is not completely true, IF they adopt a child, some would argue that the children are victimized.
A) Gay adoption is a separate issue. To bring that into the argument clouds the issue. Gay marriage still isn't comparable to child marriage.
B) I happen to think that a loving parent is better for a child than a life in the care of the state or a series of foster parents. Even a loving parent who happens to be gay.
If I was an adopted child and adopted by a gay couple I would be pretty mad. I would rather have one mother or one father than have 2 moms or 2 fathers.
Were you adopted?
Also, you're assuming those are the options. Many children go unadopted. I think more loving parents is a good thing.
If I was an adopted child and adopted by a gay couple I would be pretty mad. I would rather have one mother or one father than have 2 moms or 2 fathers.
Imagine the psych bill, Rosie's kids are going to have as adults!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.