How can we say the vaccines are fully safe when they've had no long term testing? (compared, claim)

[Robert9]

Originally Posted by YourWakeUpCall

Pro-tip: When it comes to medical stuff (or most things, for that matter), the smart money is to make decisions based on statistical data, not anecdotal evidence. You're like the guy who thinks BMWs are the epitome of reliability because Biff down the street has never had a problem with his, although there is mountain of evidence to the contrary.

is that why my family and healthy and those who got the shots are not? I will do things my way this way my loved ones and me stay safe

[MPowering1]

Originally Posted by Oldglory

lol, you lefties crack me up. What makes you think that only conservatives don't want to get the vaccine at this time? Do you and yours have to make everything about party affiliation and demonize the right?

That was sarcasm, Oldglory.

[genesiss23]

Originally Posted by Ferd

how long is long?

Traditionally, with vaccines, long term study is not completed until several years after approval. The trials generally have a follow up period of 2 years. Initially, varicella vaccine had a one shot schedule. Several years after approval, they reviewed the epidemiological data and there appeared to be an increased amount of failure on the long term and so a second dose was added.

[Stuckatredlightsagain]

Originally Posted by YourWakeUpCall

Nobody has ever claimed the vaccines are 100% safe or 100% effective. This is widely published information. You pretty much said so in your post. What's your question?

I'm not talking about efficiency. I'm talking about possible long term effects that haven't been studied because the vaccines have only be out for nine months. Things that could crop up after two or three years, fertility issues, heart issues, etc. Things you would only find out about with long-term studies.

[guyincognito]

Originally Posted by Robert9

Everyone I talk to that got it has had bad reactions. Me and my loved ones will never get it! We are healthy and plan on staying that way

The vaccine is contraindicated against conservatism. They seem to be the only ones that get sick from it.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by Robert9

Show me where I said it was? ANd why would I care??

You said your and your family are healthy so far and that everyone you talked to had bad reactions, doesn't sound like sound reasoning to avoid the vaccine.

Many, many examples of people that thought they wouldn't be infected with the virus, and then they were.

[ChrisC]

Originally Posted by Stuckatredlightsagain

I'm not talking about efficiency. I'm talking about possible long term effects that haven't been studied because the vaccines have only be out for nine months. Things that could crop up after two or three years, fertility issues, heart issues, etc. Things you would only find out about with long-term studies.

These leftists can talk until they are blue in the face about how they know the long-term safety of these vaccines. And how they know there will never be any side effects. But unless they have a time machine or are from the future, they are full of ****.

[beb0p]

Originally Posted by Robert9

Everyone I talk to that got it has had bad reactions. Me and my loved ones will never get it! We are healthy and plan on staying that way

The bad reaction is the immune system reacting to the vaccine and updating your immunity.

You can plan on staying healthy all you want, but if you're unvaccinated, it's really Covid's decision whether you get sick or not.

.

[eqttrdr]

And what's the science behind 100 or more employees?

[Tigger84Ag]

Originally Posted by Stuckatredlightsagain

The vaccines have only been around for nine months. Only the Pfizer shot was approved by the FDA. Moderna and Johnson and Johnson have yet to be approved. There haven't been long term tests done with these vaccines, so how can we say they're perfectly safe?

I agree!